中国医药导报
中國醫藥導報
중국의약도보
China Medical Herald
2015年
25期
49-52,56
,共5页
SDSR教学模式%眼科学%临床教学
SDSR教學模式%眼科學%臨床教學
SDSR교학모식%안과학%림상교학
SDSR%Ophthalmology%Clinical teaching
目的:评估SDSR教学模式在眼科学见习教学中的实践与应用效果。方法选择2014~2015学年第一学期在西安交通大学第一附属医院(以下简称“我院”)见习的2012级四年制护理学专业本科生(16名)作为SDSR教学组,采用SDSR教学;选择采用传统教学的2013~2014学年第一学期在我院见习的2011级四年制护理学专业本科生(19名)作传统教学组。采用KAP法评价授课效果,比较两组的授课效果。结果与传统教学组比较,SDSR教学组学生的学习积极性较高;SDSR教学组学生对教学的满意度[(94.05±4.19)比(80.05±7.19)分)]、知识掌握[(92.00±4.90)比(85.50±7.20)分]和实践技能[(95.00±6.49)比(82.50±5.19)分]均明显优于传统教学组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SDSR教学模式是眼科学见习教学的有效手段,提升了见习教学质量。
目的:評估SDSR教學模式在眼科學見習教學中的實踐與應用效果。方法選擇2014~2015學年第一學期在西安交通大學第一附屬醫院(以下簡稱“我院”)見習的2012級四年製護理學專業本科生(16名)作為SDSR教學組,採用SDSR教學;選擇採用傳統教學的2013~2014學年第一學期在我院見習的2011級四年製護理學專業本科生(19名)作傳統教學組。採用KAP法評價授課效果,比較兩組的授課效果。結果與傳統教學組比較,SDSR教學組學生的學習積極性較高;SDSR教學組學生對教學的滿意度[(94.05±4.19)比(80.05±7.19)分)]、知識掌握[(92.00±4.90)比(85.50±7.20)分]和實踐技能[(95.00±6.49)比(82.50±5.19)分]均明顯優于傳統教學組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 SDSR教學模式是眼科學見習教學的有效手段,提升瞭見習教學質量。
목적:평고SDSR교학모식재안과학견습교학중적실천여응용효과。방법선택2014~2015학년제일학기재서안교통대학제일부속의원(이하간칭“아원”)견습적2012급사년제호이학전업본과생(16명)작위SDSR교학조,채용SDSR교학;선택채용전통교학적2013~2014학년제일학기재아원견습적2011급사년제호이학전업본과생(19명)작전통교학조。채용KAP법평개수과효과,비교량조적수과효과。결과여전통교학조비교,SDSR교학조학생적학습적겁성교고;SDSR교학조학생대교학적만의도[(94.05±4.19)비(80.05±7.19)분)]、지식장악[(92.00±4.90)비(85.50±7.20)분]화실천기능[(95.00±6.49)비(82.50±5.19)분]균명현우우전통교학조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론 SDSR교학모식시안과학견습교학적유효수단,제승료견습교학질량。
Objective To assess the effect of SDSR in ophthalmic clinical teaching. Methods In the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, 16 probationary students of Grade 2012 four-year under-graduates majoring nursing at the first term 2014-2015 academic year were selected as SDSR group, they were taught with SDSR; 19 probationary students of four-year undergraduates majoring nursing at the first term 2013-2014 aca-demic year were selected as traditional group, they were taught with traditional teaching method. KAP was used to e-valuate the teaching effect, the teaching effect of two groups was compared. Results Compared to traditional group, stu-dents in SDSR group had more learning initiative, and satisfied with knowledge [(92.00±4.90) vs (85.50±7.20) scores], attitude [(94.05±4.19) vs (80.05±7.19) scores] and practice [(95.00±6.49) vs (82.50±5.19) scores] of students in SDSR group were better than those of students in traditional group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion SDSR is an effective means in ophthalmic teaching, and it enhances the quality of trainee teaching.