CAJ | 학술논문

目的：研究妇产科患者术后疼痛的综合护理方法。方法：选择2011年9月~2013年9月诊治的120例妇产科手术患者，根据其入院病例的单双号分为两组，对照组60例运用常规护理方法，观察组60例在常规护理的基础上进行心理护理干预措施，比较两组患者疼痛程度及对护理人员的满意度。结果：观察组患者术后疼痛程度明显比对照组低，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。观察组患者对护理工作的满意程度明显比对照组高，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。结论：术后进行综合护理干预能有效缓解患者术后疼痛程度，明显降低术后出现并发症的几率，缓解患者的紧张、恐惧等负面情绪，促进康复。
목적：연구부산과환자술후동통적종합호리방법。방법：선택2011년9월~2013년9월진치적120례부산과수술환자，근거기입원병례적단쌍호분위량조，대조조60례운용상규호리방법，관찰조60례재상규호리적기출상진행심리호리간예조시，비교량조환자동통정도급대호리인원적만의도。결과：관찰조환자술후동통정도명현비대조조저，차이유통계학의의（ P<0.05）。관찰조환자대호리공작적만의정도명현비대조조고，차이유통계학의의（ P<0.05）。결론：술후진행종합호리간예능유효완해환자술후동통정도，명현강저술후출현병발증적궤솔，완해환자적긴장、공구등부면정서，촉진강복。
Objectives:To study the comprehensive postoperative pain nursing care for patients with obstetrics and gynecology. Method:120 cases of patients with the treatment of gynecologic surgery in the hospital between September 2011 and September 2013were chosen to be divided into two groups,according to its even and odd-numbered admis-sion ,among which 60 patients in the control group were used conventional care method of treatment,and 60 patients in the observation group were heart care interventions based on the routine care. Then the pain levels and satisfaction of nursing staff were compared. Results:By comparing the two groups of patients,pain patients in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group,while the patients satisfaction with care was significantly higher than the control group( P<0 . 05 ). There was statistically significant differences between the two groups( P<0 . 05 ). Conclu-sion:Obstetrics and gynecology comprehensive care interventions can effectively relieve patients with postoperative pain, and significantly reduce the chance of postoperative complications,further relieve the patient′s stress,fear and other neg-ative emotions to promote patient recovery as soon as possible.