中国临床新医学
中國臨床新醫學
중국림상신의학
Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine
2015年
9期
864-866
,共3页
梁碧彦%钟伟湘%李尚%李秀凤%王秀丽
樑碧彥%鐘偉湘%李尚%李秀鳳%王秀麗
량벽언%종위상%리상%리수봉%왕수려
附子%煎煮时间%使用剂量%不良反应
附子%煎煮時間%使用劑量%不良反應
부자%전자시간%사용제량%불량반응
Aconite%Decoction time%Dose%Adverse reactions
目的:探讨附子临床应用中出现不良反应的影响因素。方法选取2013-01~2014-08该院收治的确诊为寒湿痹阻型痹证采用中医复方治疗的患者240例为研究对象,根据复方有无附子分为A组和B组各120例,A组给予未加附子复方治疗,B组给予附子复方治疗,观察两组的临床不良反应情况。结果 A组发生不良反应16例(13.33%),B组发生不良反应60例(50.00%),两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=32.28,P=0.000)。 B组120例患者中,有不良反应组先煎时间与煎煮总时间(min)均明显短于无不良反应组[(36.5±4.23) vs (31.46±3.16),P=0.000;(89.75±1.52) vs (86.36±2.42),P=0.000];平均使用剂量(g)也明显高于无不良反应组[(24.15±6.26) vs (20.53±3.52),t=16.712,P=0.017]。结论附子的先煎时间、煎煮总时间及其使用剂量均是影响其临床不良反应的因素。
目的:探討附子臨床應用中齣現不良反應的影響因素。方法選取2013-01~2014-08該院收治的確診為寒濕痺阻型痺證採用中醫複方治療的患者240例為研究對象,根據複方有無附子分為A組和B組各120例,A組給予未加附子複方治療,B組給予附子複方治療,觀察兩組的臨床不良反應情況。結果 A組髮生不良反應16例(13.33%),B組髮生不良反應60例(50.00%),兩組差異有統計學意義(χ2=32.28,P=0.000)。 B組120例患者中,有不良反應組先煎時間與煎煮總時間(min)均明顯短于無不良反應組[(36.5±4.23) vs (31.46±3.16),P=0.000;(89.75±1.52) vs (86.36±2.42),P=0.000];平均使用劑量(g)也明顯高于無不良反應組[(24.15±6.26) vs (20.53±3.52),t=16.712,P=0.017]。結論附子的先煎時間、煎煮總時間及其使用劑量均是影響其臨床不良反應的因素。
목적:탐토부자림상응용중출현불량반응적영향인소。방법선취2013-01~2014-08해원수치적학진위한습비조형비증채용중의복방치료적환자240례위연구대상,근거복방유무부자분위A조화B조각120례,A조급여미가부자복방치료,B조급여부자복방치료,관찰량조적림상불량반응정황。결과 A조발생불량반응16례(13.33%),B조발생불량반응60례(50.00%),량조차이유통계학의의(χ2=32.28,P=0.000)。 B조120례환자중,유불량반응조선전시간여전자총시간(min)균명현단우무불량반응조[(36.5±4.23) vs (31.46±3.16),P=0.000;(89.75±1.52) vs (86.36±2.42),P=0.000];평균사용제량(g)야명현고우무불량반응조[(24.15±6.26) vs (20.53±3.52),t=16.712,P=0.017]。결론부자적선전시간、전자총시간급기사용제량균시영향기림상불량반응적인소。
Objective To explore the influence factors of adverse reactions on the clinical application of aco -nite root.Methods 240 patients who received the therapy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) were selected as the research objects and were randomly divided into two groups .Group A was given the treatment of TCM compounds without aconite root ( n=120 ) , while group B was given the matched prescriptions with aconite root ( n=120 ) .The clinical adverse reactions were compared between the two groups .Results There were 16 cases(13.33%) with ad-verse reactions in group A, and 60 cases (50.00%) in group B, with a significant difference (χ2 =32.28, P=0.000 ) .Among 120 patients of group B , the first decoction time and the total decoction time were significantly shor-ter in the subgroup of adverse reactions than those in the subgroup of non-adverse reactions [ ( 36.5 ±4.23 ) min vs (31.46 ±3.16)min, P=0.000;(89.75 ±1.52)min vs (86.36 ±2.42)min, P=0.000].The mean dose of the subgroup of adverse reactions was significantly higher than that of the subgroup of non -adverse reactions [ ( 24.15 ± 6.26) vs (20.53 ±3.52), t=16.712, P=0.017].Conclusion Decoction time of aconite root and its dosage are the factors that affect the clinical adverse reactions .