CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比分析国内外MOOC医学课程现状，为中国学习者提供高效便捷的MOOC医学课程及远程医学教育。方法：对Coursera、edX、“中国大学MOOC”、“人卫慕课”4家平台的医学课程在数量、授课大学、授课语言、课程认证及中外MOOC医学课程的发展现状进行了对比分析。结果：中国的MOOC医学课程在数量、规模、认证方式等方面与国外还存在一定差距。结论：国内医学工作者应抓住机遇，为国内学习者提供更为便利高效的MOOC医学学习平台。
목적：대비분석국내외MOOC의학과정현상，위중국학습자제공고효편첩적MOOC의학과정급원정의학교육。방법：대Coursera、edX、“중국대학MOOC”、“인위모과”4가평태적의학과정재수량、수과대학、수과어언、과정인증급중외MOOC의학과정적발전현상진행료대비분석。결과：중국적MOOC의학과정재수량、규모、인증방식등방면여국외환존재일정차거。결론：국내의학공작자응조주궤우，위국내학습자제공경위편리고효적MOOC의학학습평태。
Objective To provide the effective and convenient medical MOOC and remote medical education by comparatively analyzing domestic and foreign medical MOOC.Methods The following items were comparatively an-alyzed, including the number of medical MOOC, the universities offering medical MOOC, the languages used in teaching medical MOOC, the identification of MOOC, and the development of domestic and foreign medical MOOC on platforms of Coursera, edX, China university MOOC and people's health MOOC.Results The domestic medical MOOC still had a longer way to go than foreign medical MOOC in their number, scale and identification.Conclu-sion Domestic medical workers should grasp the opportunity to provide more effective and convenient medical MOOC platform.