中华全科医师杂志
中華全科醫師雜誌
중화전과의사잡지
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2015年
9期
670-674
,共5页
余海峰%施慧飞%谢海萍%周剑宇%冯成%聂艳芳%傅秋月%李春胜%张薇
餘海峰%施慧飛%謝海萍%週劍宇%馮成%聶豔芳%傅鞦月%李春勝%張薇
여해봉%시혜비%사해평%주검우%풍성%섭염방%부추월%리춘성%장미
活组织检查,针吸%肾%肾小球滤过率%血肿
活組織檢查,針吸%腎%腎小毬濾過率%血腫
활조직검사,침흡%신%신소구려과솔%혈종
Biopsy,needle%Kidney%Glomerular filtration rate%Hematoma
目的 探讨不同的经皮肾穿刺活检方法对穿刺肾功能的影响,获取的肾小球数量及肾周血肿发生率的差异.方法 浙江省台州市中心医院2009年6月至2014年12月资料完整的肾穿刺患者共453例,2012年4月前采用B超定位后徒手盲法负压抽吸穿刺法,221例;2012年5月后采用B超直视下穿刺枪穿刺法,232例.肾穿刺前及后(6~16 d)应用发射单光子计算机断层扫描仪(ECT) 99mTc二乙稀三胺五乙酸测定双肾肾小球滤过率(GFR),比较穿刺前后GFR水平的变化.肾穿后1 ~10d行肾脏B超检查.比较两种穿刺方法获取的肾小球数量、肾周血肿发生率差异.结果 ①负压抽吸法肾穿前GFR(37.7±11.6) ml/min,穿刺后(38.3±11.7) ml/min(t =0.485,P=0.628);直视穿刺枪法肾穿前GFR(36.8±11.3) ml/min,穿刺后(37.4±11.9) ml/min(t=0.565,P=0.572).②肾穿刺后肾周血肿直径>5 cm的发生率5.3% (24/453),肾周血肿直径≤5 cm的发生率6.0%(27/453).血肿>5 cm者穿刺前GFR为(37.5±10.7) ml/min,穿刺后GFR为(33.5±10.1)ml/min,差异有统计学意义(t=2.103,P=0.038).③负压抽吸法获取肾小球数(26.4±15.9)个,直视穿刺枪法获取肾小球数(20.6±9.9)个,差异有统计学意义(t =4.648,P=0.000).④负压抽吸法肾周血肿发生率6.8%(15/221),直视穿刺枪法15.5% (36/232),差异有统计学意义(x2=8.634,P=0.003).⑤直视穿刺枪法肾穿成功率显著高于负压抽吸法(98.7±7.5)%与(61.4±25.8)%,=5.453,P=0.000.结论 肾穿刺后出现大血肿者短期内穿刺肾GFR水平下降.负压抽吸法肾活检获取肾小球数较多,肾周血肿发生率及穿刺成功率较低.
目的 探討不同的經皮腎穿刺活檢方法對穿刺腎功能的影響,穫取的腎小毬數量及腎週血腫髮生率的差異.方法 浙江省檯州市中心醫院2009年6月至2014年12月資料完整的腎穿刺患者共453例,2012年4月前採用B超定位後徒手盲法負壓抽吸穿刺法,221例;2012年5月後採用B超直視下穿刺鎗穿刺法,232例.腎穿刺前及後(6~16 d)應用髮射單光子計算機斷層掃描儀(ECT) 99mTc二乙稀三胺五乙痠測定雙腎腎小毬濾過率(GFR),比較穿刺前後GFR水平的變化.腎穿後1 ~10d行腎髒B超檢查.比較兩種穿刺方法穫取的腎小毬數量、腎週血腫髮生率差異.結果 ①負壓抽吸法腎穿前GFR(37.7±11.6) ml/min,穿刺後(38.3±11.7) ml/min(t =0.485,P=0.628);直視穿刺鎗法腎穿前GFR(36.8±11.3) ml/min,穿刺後(37.4±11.9) ml/min(t=0.565,P=0.572).②腎穿刺後腎週血腫直徑>5 cm的髮生率5.3% (24/453),腎週血腫直徑≤5 cm的髮生率6.0%(27/453).血腫>5 cm者穿刺前GFR為(37.5±10.7) ml/min,穿刺後GFR為(33.5±10.1)ml/min,差異有統計學意義(t=2.103,P=0.038).③負壓抽吸法穫取腎小毬數(26.4±15.9)箇,直視穿刺鎗法穫取腎小毬數(20.6±9.9)箇,差異有統計學意義(t =4.648,P=0.000).④負壓抽吸法腎週血腫髮生率6.8%(15/221),直視穿刺鎗法15.5% (36/232),差異有統計學意義(x2=8.634,P=0.003).⑤直視穿刺鎗法腎穿成功率顯著高于負壓抽吸法(98.7±7.5)%與(61.4±25.8)%,=5.453,P=0.000.結論 腎穿刺後齣現大血腫者短期內穿刺腎GFR水平下降.負壓抽吸法腎活檢穫取腎小毬數較多,腎週血腫髮生率及穿刺成功率較低.
목적 탐토불동적경피신천자활검방법대천자신공능적영향,획취적신소구수량급신주혈종발생솔적차이.방법 절강성태주시중심의원2009년6월지2014년12월자료완정적신천자환자공453례,2012년4월전채용B초정위후도수맹법부압추흡천자법,221례;2012년5월후채용B초직시하천자창천자법,232례.신천자전급후(6~16 d)응용발사단광자계산궤단층소묘의(ECT) 99mTc이을희삼알오을산측정쌍신신소구려과솔(GFR),비교천자전후GFR수평적변화.신천후1 ~10d행신장B초검사.비교량충천자방법획취적신소구수량、신주혈종발생솔차이.결과 ①부압추흡법신천전GFR(37.7±11.6) ml/min,천자후(38.3±11.7) ml/min(t =0.485,P=0.628);직시천자창법신천전GFR(36.8±11.3) ml/min,천자후(37.4±11.9) ml/min(t=0.565,P=0.572).②신천자후신주혈종직경>5 cm적발생솔5.3% (24/453),신주혈종직경≤5 cm적발생솔6.0%(27/453).혈종>5 cm자천자전GFR위(37.5±10.7) ml/min,천자후GFR위(33.5±10.1)ml/min,차이유통계학의의(t=2.103,P=0.038).③부압추흡법획취신소구수(26.4±15.9)개,직시천자창법획취신소구수(20.6±9.9)개,차이유통계학의의(t =4.648,P=0.000).④부압추흡법신주혈종발생솔6.8%(15/221),직시천자창법15.5% (36/232),차이유통계학의의(x2=8.634,P=0.003).⑤직시천자창법신천성공솔현저고우부압추흡법(98.7±7.5)%여(61.4±25.8)%,=5.453,P=0.000.결론 신천자후출현대혈종자단기내천자신GFR수평하강.부압추흡법신활검획취신소구수교다,신주혈종발생솔급천자성공솔교저.
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of different percutaneous renal needle biopsy methods.Methods Total 453 patients underwent renal needle biopsy in Taizhou Central Hospital during June 2009 and December 2014,including 221 patients received ultrasound-guided negative pressure suction puncture and 232 patients received ultrasound-guided biopsy gun puncture.The glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) were measured with single photon computed tomography [ECT (99m Tc-DTPA)] before and after renal puncture.The amount of glomeruli obtained and incidence of perirenal hematoma were documented and compared between two groups.Results GFRs of punctured renal in negative pressure group were (37.7 ± 11.6) ml/min before puncture and (38.3 ± 11.7) ml/min after puncture (t =0.485,P =0.628) ; those in biopsy gun group were (36.8 ± 11.3) ml/min before puncture and (37.4 ± 11.9) ml/min after puncture (t =0.565,P =0.572).The incidence of perirenal hematoma > 5 cm and ≤5 cm was 5.3 % (24/453) and 6.0% (27/453),respectively.In hematoma > 5cm group the GFR was decreased from (37.5 ± 10.7) ml/min before renal puncture to (33.5 ± 10.1) ml/min after puncture (t =2.103,P =0.038).The amount of glomeruli obtained by negative pressure puncture and by biopsy gun puncture was 26.4 ± 15.9 and 20.6 ± 9.9,respectively (t =4.648,P =0.000).The incidence of perirenal hematoma in negative pressure and biopsy gun groups was 6.8% (15/221) and 15.5% (36/232),respectively (x2 =8.634,P =0.003).The successful rate of renal needle biopsy in biopsy gun group was significant higher than that in negative pressure group [98.7 ± 7.5 % vs.61.4 ± 25.8%,t =5.453,P =0.000].Conclusions The large hematoma in punctured kidney would reduce the GFR in short-time.Negative pressure suction puncture may obtain more glomeruli and have lower incidence of perirenal hematoma,but have lower successful rate of renal needle biopsy.