世界地理研究
世界地理研究
세계지리연구
World Regional Studies
2015年
3期
24-33
,共10页
钓鱼岛%尺度政治分析%国家领土争端%尺度转换
釣魚島%呎度政治分析%國傢領土爭耑%呎度轉換
조어도%척도정치분석%국가령토쟁단%척도전환
Diaoyu Islands Dispute%politics of scale%the territory dispute between the countries%scale jumping
2012年日本“购岛”使钓鱼岛争端再度回温，如何在“和平与发展”的时代主题下妥善解决这一争端成为至关重要的问题。本文运用尺度政治分析的一般框架，对钓鱼岛争端进行尺度政治分析探究，并结合对中方外交部关于钓鱼岛事件的发言的词频分析了解中方对日的真实政策内涵。分析认为，在争端处理中，中方的尺度转换方式更为成功：在事件前期，中方作为弱势方通过“表达”的方式引导舆论，获得了国内民众这一第三方的强力支持，将事件尺度进行了上推；在事件后期，日方试图寻求美国、东盟、舆论等第三方的支持，然而第三方国家反而对尺度进行了下推。通过对中方真实政策的分析，认为中方期望以和平的外交谈判方式解决，但在外交战方面不会放松警惕。
2012年日本“購島”使釣魚島爭耑再度迴溫，如何在“和平與髮展”的時代主題下妥善解決這一爭耑成為至關重要的問題。本文運用呎度政治分析的一般框架，對釣魚島爭耑進行呎度政治分析探究，併結閤對中方外交部關于釣魚島事件的髮言的詞頻分析瞭解中方對日的真實政策內涵。分析認為，在爭耑處理中，中方的呎度轉換方式更為成功：在事件前期，中方作為弱勢方通過“錶達”的方式引導輿論，穫得瞭國內民衆這一第三方的彊力支持，將事件呎度進行瞭上推；在事件後期，日方試圖尋求美國、東盟、輿論等第三方的支持，然而第三方國傢反而對呎度進行瞭下推。通過對中方真實政策的分析，認為中方期望以和平的外交談判方式解決，但在外交戰方麵不會放鬆警惕。
2012년일본“구도”사조어도쟁단재도회온，여하재“화평여발전”적시대주제하타선해결저일쟁단성위지관중요적문제。본문운용척도정치분석적일반광가，대조어도쟁단진행척도정치분석탐구，병결합대중방외교부관우조어도사건적발언적사빈분석료해중방대일적진실정책내함。분석인위，재쟁단처리중，중방적척도전환방식경위성공：재사건전기，중방작위약세방통과“표체”적방식인도여론，획득료국내민음저일제삼방적강력지지，장사건척도진행료상추；재사건후기，일방시도심구미국、동맹、여론등제삼방적지지，연이제삼방국가반이대척도진행료하추。통과대중방진실정책적분석，인위중방기망이화평적외교담판방식해결，단재외교전방면불회방송경척。
Since the “purchase”in 2012, the Diaoyu Islands dispute heated up again, how to solve this dispute properly under the themes of the times—“Peace and Development”has become a crucial problem. This paper analyzed this dispute through the general framework of the politics of scale. After that, this paper trying to show the real policy against Japan on the Diaoyu Islands dispute by making word frequency analysis of the statements of the Chinese Foreign Ministry. The analysis shows that the Chinese government has made a more successful scale jumping: At the early stage, the Chinese government guided the public opinion through representation as the weak side, and won the support from the Chinese people to upscale the dispute; at the late stage, al-though the Japanese government was trying to seek support from America, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and the public opinion, the third party didn’t help the Japanese government get back the initiative. The results of the analysis of the real policy showed that the will of peaceful diplomatic negotiations is obvious while the Chinese government will never drop their guard on the diplomatic war.
