解放军医院管理杂志
解放軍醫院管理雜誌
해방군의원관리잡지
Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
2015年
8期
704-706
,共3页
徐彬%沈念红%胡筱峰%钱一平
徐彬%瀋唸紅%鬍篠峰%錢一平
서빈%침념홍%호소봉%전일평
指纹识别仪%精神障碍%护理管理%身份识别
指紋識彆儀%精神障礙%護理管理%身份識彆
지문식별의%정신장애%호리관리%신빈식별
fingerprint identification instrument%mental disorders%nursing management%identity recognition
目的：探讨指纹识别仪对精神病患者身份识别管理质量的影响，为规范完善精神病患者身份识别提供可靠依据。方法通过腕带识别、指纹识别仪识别，比较使用两种标识对精神病患者身份识别的依从率、缺陷率、腕带材料成本节约率、精神病患者对身份识别的满意率、意外情况发生率的影响。结果两组精神病患者对身份识别依从率分别是82％、98％，差异有统计学意义（χ2＝45．81，P＜0．05）；身份识别的缺陷率分别是36％、6％，差异有统计学意义（χ2＝282．74，P＜0．05）；腕带材料成本节约率分别是5％、45％，差异有统计学意义（χ2＝490．08，P＜0．05）；精神病患者对身份识别方式的满意率分别是86％、99％，差异有统计学意义（χ2＝10．07，P＜0．05）；两组患者意外情况发生率分别是3．5％，3．9％，差异无统计学意义（χ2＝0．26，P＞0．05）。结论指纹识别仪在确保患者身份信息准确的情况下，针对精神病患者的特点避免腕带使用的局限性，其提高精神科护患双方身份识别的依从性，降低身份识别的缺陷率，节约人力材料成本，提高护患双方的满意率；可根据诊疗护理操作的内容、范围、患者的特点等，共同或分别应用两种识别方法，有利于提高精神科临床护理管理质量。
目的：探討指紋識彆儀對精神病患者身份識彆管理質量的影響，為規範完善精神病患者身份識彆提供可靠依據。方法通過腕帶識彆、指紋識彆儀識彆，比較使用兩種標識對精神病患者身份識彆的依從率、缺陷率、腕帶材料成本節約率、精神病患者對身份識彆的滿意率、意外情況髮生率的影響。結果兩組精神病患者對身份識彆依從率分彆是82％、98％，差異有統計學意義（χ2＝45．81，P＜0．05）；身份識彆的缺陷率分彆是36％、6％，差異有統計學意義（χ2＝282．74，P＜0．05）；腕帶材料成本節約率分彆是5％、45％，差異有統計學意義（χ2＝490．08，P＜0．05）；精神病患者對身份識彆方式的滿意率分彆是86％、99％，差異有統計學意義（χ2＝10．07，P＜0．05）；兩組患者意外情況髮生率分彆是3．5％，3．9％，差異無統計學意義（χ2＝0．26，P＞0．05）。結論指紋識彆儀在確保患者身份信息準確的情況下，針對精神病患者的特點避免腕帶使用的跼限性，其提高精神科護患雙方身份識彆的依從性，降低身份識彆的缺陷率，節約人力材料成本，提高護患雙方的滿意率；可根據診療護理操作的內容、範圍、患者的特點等，共同或分彆應用兩種識彆方法，有利于提高精神科臨床護理管理質量。
목적：탐토지문식별의대정신병환자신빈식별관리질량적영향，위규범완선정신병환자신빈식별제공가고의거。방법통과완대식별、지문식별의식별，비교사용량충표식대정신병환자신빈식별적의종솔、결함솔、완대재료성본절약솔、정신병환자대신빈식별적만의솔、의외정황발생솔적영향。결과량조정신병환자대신빈식별의종솔분별시82％、98％，차이유통계학의의（χ2＝45．81，P＜0．05）；신빈식별적결함솔분별시36％、6％，차이유통계학의의（χ2＝282．74，P＜0．05）；완대재료성본절약솔분별시5％、45％，차이유통계학의의（χ2＝490．08，P＜0．05）；정신병환자대신빈식별방식적만의솔분별시86％、99％，차이유통계학의의（χ2＝10．07，P＜0．05）；량조환자의외정황발생솔분별시3．5％，3．9％，차이무통계학의의（χ2＝0．26，P＞0．05）。결론지문식별의재학보환자신빈신식준학적정황하，침대정신병환자적특점피면완대사용적국한성，기제고정신과호환쌍방신빈식별적의종성，강저신빈식별적결함솔，절약인력재료성본，제고호환쌍방적만의솔；가근거진료호리조작적내용、범위、환자적특점등，공동혹분별응용량충식별방법，유리우제고정신과림상호리관리질량。
Objective To explore the effects of different identity identification methods in the quality of clinical nursing management of psychosis patients, to further standardize and provide a reliable basis for improving mental patient identification.Methods The wristband identification, fingerprint identification instrument recogni-tion, comparison between two kinds of identification of mental patient identification compliance rate, defect rate, wrist strap material cost saving rates, satisfaction for the identification of mental patients, rate of accident rate.Re-sults The identification of two groups of psychiatric patients compliance rate were 82%and 98%respectively, the difference has statistical significance(χ2 =45.81,P<0.05);Defect identification rates were 36%and 6%respec-tively, the difference has statistical significance(χ2 =282.74,P<0.05);Wrist strap material cost saving rates were 5%and 45%respectively, the difference has statistical significance(χ2 =490.08,P<0.05); Satisfied with the way of identifying the mental patient rates were 86% and 99% respectively, the difference has statistical signifi-cance(χ2 =10.07,P<0.05);The wristband, recognition of two groups of patients accident rates were 3.5% and 3.9%respectively, there was no significant difference in(χ2 =0.26,P>0.05).Conclusion The fingerprint i-dentification device to ensure the mental status in patients with accurate information can make up the limitation with use, it improve the psychiatric nursing compliance of both patient identification, reduce the defect identification rate, save manpower and material costs and improve both nurses and patients satisfaction rate.According to the content, scope of treatment and care, patient characteristics, jointly or separately using two recognition methods was beneficial to improve the quality of clinical nursing management in psychiatric department.
