临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
2015年
17期
1466-1468
,共3页
正畸矫治%微种植体支抗%自攻钛种植体支抗
正畸矯治%微種植體支抗%自攻鈦種植體支抗
정기교치%미충식체지항%자공태충식체지항
Orthodontic treatment%MIA%SDIA
目的:比较微种植体支抗和自攻钛种植体支抗的临床应用价值。方法选择接受口腔科正畸治疗的患者作为研究对象,随机分为接受微种植体支抗治疗的对照组及接受自攻钛种植体支抗治疗的观察组。比较两组患者的治疗后牙齿功能相关指标、X线头影测量软硬组织变化、龈沟液中炎症因子水平等差异。结果治疗后,观察组患者的牙龈、出血指数以及松动度均低于对照组,咬合力和咀嚼效率均高于对照组( P <0.05)。接受矫治后,两组患者的炎症因子水平均有上升,但是两者之间无明显统计学差异( P >0.05)。观察组患者接受矫治后的龈沟液中炎症因子水平明显低于对照组患者( P <0.05)。结论自攻钛种植体支抗可以有效减少牙齿损伤,优化口腔软硬组织指标值,不增加牙龈炎症水平,是一种安全高效的口腔矫治方式。
目的:比較微種植體支抗和自攻鈦種植體支抗的臨床應用價值。方法選擇接受口腔科正畸治療的患者作為研究對象,隨機分為接受微種植體支抗治療的對照組及接受自攻鈦種植體支抗治療的觀察組。比較兩組患者的治療後牙齒功能相關指標、X線頭影測量軟硬組織變化、齦溝液中炎癥因子水平等差異。結果治療後,觀察組患者的牙齦、齣血指數以及鬆動度均低于對照組,咬閤力和咀嚼效率均高于對照組( P <0.05)。接受矯治後,兩組患者的炎癥因子水平均有上升,但是兩者之間無明顯統計學差異( P >0.05)。觀察組患者接受矯治後的齦溝液中炎癥因子水平明顯低于對照組患者( P <0.05)。結論自攻鈦種植體支抗可以有效減少牙齒損傷,優化口腔軟硬組織指標值,不增加牙齦炎癥水平,是一種安全高效的口腔矯治方式。
목적:비교미충식체지항화자공태충식체지항적림상응용개치。방법선택접수구강과정기치료적환자작위연구대상,수궤분위접수미충식체지항치료적대조조급접수자공태충식체지항치료적관찰조。비교량조환자적치료후아치공능상관지표、X선두영측량연경조직변화、간구액중염증인자수평등차이。결과치료후,관찰조환자적아간、출혈지수이급송동도균저우대조조,교합력화저작효솔균고우대조조( P <0.05)。접수교치후,량조환자적염증인자수평균유상승,단시량자지간무명현통계학차이( P >0.05)。관찰조환자접수교치후적간구액중염증인자수평명현저우대조조환자( P <0.05)。결론자공태충식체지항가이유효감소아치손상,우화구강연경조직지표치,불증가아간염증수평,시일충안전고효적구강교치방식。
Objective To compare of micro-implant anchorage and self-tapping titanium implant anchorage. Methods Patients in our hospital receiving dentistry orthodontic treatment were included into this research subjects,which were randomly assigned to control group re-ceiving MIA and observation group receiving SDIA,compared dental function related indicators,X-ray cephalometric hard and soft tissue chan-ges,GCF levels of inflammatory factors. Results The observation group patients′gingival index,bleeding index,degree of acceptance loose after correction were lower than those of control group. The chewing efficiency and bite force was significantly higher than those of control group( P <0. 05). Observation group patients′levels of inflammatory cytokines after receiving treatment had an increase in both groups,but no significant difference( P >0. 05). Observation group patients′GCF levels of inflammatory factors after treatment was significantly lower than those of control group patients( P <0. 05). Conclusion SDIA can effectively reduce tooth damage,optimize the value of oral hard and soft tissue targets,re-duce the level of inflammation GCF. SDIA is a safe and efficient way of oral appliance.