CAJ | 학술논문

笔者以办案实践中“农村自建房中房主是否对雇员损害承担责任”的提供劳务受害责任纠纷案例为视角，发现审判实践中对最高人民法院关于《审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称解释)第11条与《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》(以下简称侵权责任法)第35条的法律适用存在冲突，提出《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第35条已取代解释第11条之规定，原解释第11条不能再适用，农村自建房中房主对雇员损害责任应适用过错责任原则，不应适用连带责任原则，从而真正实现法律适用的公平与正义价值。
필자이판안실천중“농촌자건방중방주시부대고원손해승담책임”적제공노무수해책임규분안례위시각，발현심판실천중대최고인민법원관우《심리인신손해배상안건괄용법률약간문제적해석》(이하간칭해석)제11조여《중화인민공화국침권책임법》(이하간칭침권책임법)제35조적법률괄용존재충돌，제출《중화인민공화국침권책임법》제35조이취대해석제11조지규정，원해석제11조불능재괄용，농촌자건방중방주대고원손해책임응괄용과착책임원칙，불응괄용련대책임원칙，종이진정실현법률괄용적공평여정의개치。
Based on working practice "rural self-built houses the owner is responsible for employee damage" of the service provided the victim liability disputes case for Angle of view, in judicial practice to find the supreme people's court on the trial of cases on compensation for personal injury to explain some issues of applicable law (hereinafter referred to as "explain") article 11 and the tort liability law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the tort liability law article 35) the applicable law of conflict, puts forward the "tort liability law of the People's Republic of China article 35 has replaced explain the provisions of article 11, article 11 of the original explanation cannot apply again, rural self-built houses homeowners on employees' liability for damage should apply the principle of fault liability, should not apply the principle of joint and several liability, so as to achieve the fair and justice of law applicable value.