安徽医学
安徽醫學
안휘의학
Anhui Medical Journal
2015年
9期
1159-1161
,共3页
殷春许%陈葆春%胡琼%张岭
慇春許%陳葆春%鬍瓊%張嶺
은춘허%진보춘%호경%장령
350 MW级燃煤电厂%化学毒物危害%风险评估
350 MW級燃煤電廠%化學毒物危害%風險評估
350 MW급연매전엄%화학독물위해%풍험평고
350 MW coal-fired power plant%Chemical poisons%Hazard risk assessment
目的:对皖北某350 MW级燃煤电厂的化学毒物进行职业危害风险评估,为350 MW级燃煤电厂职业危害关键控制点的风险管理提供技术依据。方法调查某350 MW级燃煤电厂的职业卫生现状及主要化学危害因素种类,采用风险矩阵分析法对某350 MW级燃煤电厂的化学毒物职业危害风险进行评估,风险水平根据健康危害等级( HR)和暴露等级( ER)进行计算。结果皖北某350 MW级燃煤电厂化学毒物中的氨、盐酸、二氧化氮、一氧化碳、硫化氢为中等风险水平,氢氧化钠、二氧化硫、臭氧、硫酸为低风险水平。结论皖北某350 MW级燃煤电厂化学毒物职业危害风险为可接受水平,今后化学毒物危害风险控制重点应加强安全防护措施,防止氨泄漏、盐酸挥发和二氧化氮、一氧化碳逸散引发急性职业中毒以及脱硫废水处理中的硫化氢中毒。
目的:對皖北某350 MW級燃煤電廠的化學毒物進行職業危害風險評估,為350 MW級燃煤電廠職業危害關鍵控製點的風險管理提供技術依據。方法調查某350 MW級燃煤電廠的職業衛生現狀及主要化學危害因素種類,採用風險矩陣分析法對某350 MW級燃煤電廠的化學毒物職業危害風險進行評估,風險水平根據健康危害等級( HR)和暴露等級( ER)進行計算。結果皖北某350 MW級燃煤電廠化學毒物中的氨、鹽痠、二氧化氮、一氧化碳、硫化氫為中等風險水平,氫氧化鈉、二氧化硫、臭氧、硫痠為低風險水平。結論皖北某350 MW級燃煤電廠化學毒物職業危害風險為可接受水平,今後化學毒物危害風險控製重點應加彊安全防護措施,防止氨洩漏、鹽痠揮髮和二氧化氮、一氧化碳逸散引髮急性職業中毒以及脫硫廢水處理中的硫化氫中毒。
목적:대환북모350 MW급연매전엄적화학독물진행직업위해풍험평고,위350 MW급연매전엄직업위해관건공제점적풍험관리제공기술의거。방법조사모350 MW급연매전엄적직업위생현상급주요화학위해인소충류,채용풍험구진분석법대모350 MW급연매전엄적화학독물직업위해풍험진행평고,풍험수평근거건강위해등급( HR)화폭로등급( ER)진행계산。결과환북모350 MW급연매전엄화학독물중적안、염산、이양화담、일양화탄、류화경위중등풍험수평,경양화납、이양화류、취양、류산위저풍험수평。결론환북모350 MW급연매전엄화학독물직업위해풍험위가접수수평,금후화학독물위해풍험공제중점응가강안전방호조시,방지안설루、염산휘발화이양화담、일양화탄일산인발급성직업중독이급탈류폐수처리중적류화경중독。
Objective To assess the chemical poisons hazard risk of one 350 MW coal-fired power plant in north Anhui province, for providing technical basis of risk management of chemical poisons hazard in same level power plants. Methods One 350 MW coal-fired power plant was chosen, and its chemical poisons health status and main types of occupational hazard factors were investigated. The chemical poisons occupational hazard risk of this plant was assessed according the risk matrix analysis method. The level of risk was calculated based on hazard rating and exposure rating, Risk=HR:hazard rating, ER:exposure rating. Results The result of research on the chemical hazard of this 350 MW coal-fired power plant was: ammonia, hydrochloric acid, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide were in middle risk level;sodium hydroxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone and sulfuric acid were in low risk level. Conclusion The chemical poisons haz-ard risk level of this 350 MW coal-fired power plant is within tolerance. In future this plant should emphasize the following points for risk management of chemical poisons hazard: to strengthen the safety protection management and avoid acute occupational poisoning caused by ammonia leakage, hydrochloric acidvolatile and nitrogen dioxide & carbon monoxide escape into the air, and at the same time to prevent hy-drogen sulfide poisoning in the desulfurization wastewater treatment.