安徽医学
安徽醫學
안휘의학
Anhui Medical Journal
2015年
9期
1144-1146
,共3页
病毒性心肌炎%家庭护理%干预
病毒性心肌炎%傢庭護理%榦預
병독성심기염%가정호리%간예
Viral myocarditis%Home care%Intervention
目的：探讨有计划的电话回访对病毒性心肌炎患儿康复效果的影响。方法72例病毒性心肌炎患儿随机分为干预组和对照组，每组36例。干预组出院后针对不同康复阶段，将宣教内容有计划的进行电话回访；对照组出院时仅给予常规出院宣教。半年后观察比较两组患儿康复情况，总结通过计划性电话回访延续家庭护理的经验。结果对照组中，病情反复或加重10例(27．78%)，二次住院8例(22．22%)，复查3次3例(8．33%)，无一例复查4次(0．00%)，治疗和护理不满意8例(22．22%)。干预组中，病情反复或加重3例(8．33%)，二次住院2例(5．56%)，复查3次21例(58．33%)，复查4次13例(36．11%)，治疗和护理不满意2例(5．56%)。两组相比，差异有统计学意义(P<0．05)。结论有计划的电话回访可改善病毒性心肌炎患儿康复效果。
目的：探討有計劃的電話迴訪對病毒性心肌炎患兒康複效果的影響。方法72例病毒性心肌炎患兒隨機分為榦預組和對照組，每組36例。榦預組齣院後針對不同康複階段，將宣教內容有計劃的進行電話迴訪；對照組齣院時僅給予常規齣院宣教。半年後觀察比較兩組患兒康複情況，總結通過計劃性電話迴訪延續傢庭護理的經驗。結果對照組中，病情反複或加重10例(27．78%)，二次住院8例(22．22%)，複查3次3例(8．33%)，無一例複查4次(0．00%)，治療和護理不滿意8例(22．22%)。榦預組中，病情反複或加重3例(8．33%)，二次住院2例(5．56%)，複查3次21例(58．33%)，複查4次13例(36．11%)，治療和護理不滿意2例(5．56%)。兩組相比，差異有統計學意義(P<0．05)。結論有計劃的電話迴訪可改善病毒性心肌炎患兒康複效果。
목적：탐토유계화적전화회방대병독성심기염환인강복효과적영향。방법72례병독성심기염환인수궤분위간예조화대조조，매조36례。간예조출원후침대불동강복계단，장선교내용유계화적진행전화회방；대조조출원시부급여상규출원선교。반년후관찰비교량조환인강복정황，총결통과계화성전화회방연속가정호리적경험。결과대조조중，병정반복혹가중10례(27．78%)，이차주원8례(22．22%)，복사3차3례(8．33%)，무일례복사4차(0．00%)，치료화호리불만의8례(22．22%)。간예조중，병정반복혹가중3례(8．33%)，이차주원2례(5．56%)，복사3차21례(58．33%)，복사4차13례(36．11%)，치료화호리불만의2례(5．56%)。량조상비，차이유통계학의의(P<0．05)。결론유계화적전화회방가개선병독성심기염환인강복효과。
Objective To explore the influence of scheduled telephone follow-up on rehabilitation effect in children with viral myo-carditis. Methods Totally 72 cases of children with myocarditis were randomly divided into 2 groups. The intervention group received our scheduled telephone follow-up according to the different stages of rehabilitation after discharge, and the control group only received general guidance at the time of discharging. Recovery situation was observed in 2 groups after six months, and the experience of subsequent was summed up. Results Among the 36 cases in the control group, there were 10 cases (27. 78%) whose illness was recurring or got worse, 8 cases(22. 22%)hospitalized twice, 3 cases (8. 33%) reviewed 3 times and 0 case(0. 00%)reviewed 4 times, and 8 cases(22. 22%)not satisfied with treatment and nursing effect. Of all the 36 cases of intervention group, there were 3 cases (8. 33%) whose illness was recurring or got worse, 2 cases(5. 56%)hospitalized twice, 21(58. 33%)reviewed 3 times and 4(36. 11%)reviewed 4 times, only 2(5. 56%)not satisfied with treatment and nursing effect. By comparing the effect in two groups, the difference was significant (P<0. 05). Conclusion By giving scheduled telephone follow-up and standardizing home nursing care to children with myocarditis, better result can be achieved, and this experience is worth popularizing.
