CAJ | 학술논문

本文梳理和分析了清乾隆朝殿试策问中史学考题的内容、出题形式及特点，揭示出乾隆时期一系列大规模官方学术活动的开展，是造就这一阶段史学繁荣的根本原因，此正是统治者高度重视史学的政治功能与社会效用所致。由此笔者提出结论：当下的科举史研究，大多探讨科举考试的历史背景、考试程序，殿试对策的语言艺术和试卷的文献价值，较少关注殿试策问本身的内容、思想倾向、命题技巧，及其中所体现的政治与学术之间的互动关系。如能从这一角度入手，不仅能丰富中国传统史学的研究，且必能为中国古代文化史、学术史和科举制度史的研究开辟一个新的视角。
본문소리화분석료청건륭조전시책문중사학고제적내용、출제형식급특점，게시출건륭시기일계렬대규모관방학술활동적개전，시조취저일계단사학번영적근본원인，차정시통치자고도중시사학적정치공능여사회효용소치。유차필자제출결론：당하적과거사연구，대다탐토과거고시적역사배경、고시정서，전시대책적어언예술화시권적문헌개치，교소관주전시책문본신적내용、사상경향、명제기교，급기중소체현적정치여학술지간적호동관계。여능종저일각도입수，불부능봉부중국전통사학적연구，차필능위중국고대문화사、학술사화과거제도사적연구개벽일개신적시각。
This article analyses and Qing Qianlong dynasty final imperial examination answers in the history examination questions of content, form and characteristics of questions reveal a series of large-scale official academic activities in the Qianlong period, is the root cause of the make this stage historical prosperity, this is the ruler, attaches great importance to the political functions of historical and social utility. Thus the author put forward the conclusion that the present research into the history of the imperial most background to explore the history of the imperial examination, examination procedures, the final imperial examination measures of language arts and the literature value of the examination paper, less attention to position the content of the answers is proposition, mindset, skills, and embodied in the interaction between politics and academic. If you could start from this Angle, not only can enrich the study of Chinese traditional historiography, and the ancient Chinese cultural history, academic history and will open up a new perspective to the research on the history of the imperial examination system.