国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
International Medicine and Health Guidance News
2015年
17期
2570-2573
,共4页
丁全明%梁伟%王刚%冯世伟%邱忠凯%孙桂兰%赵兴亮%孙黎黎%张帆
丁全明%樑偉%王剛%馮世偉%邱忠凱%孫桂蘭%趙興亮%孫黎黎%張帆
정전명%량위%왕강%풍세위%구충개%손계란%조흥량%손려려%장범
上段输尿管结石%体外冲击波碎石术%输尿管镜下碎石术%经皮肾碎石术
上段輸尿管結石%體外遲擊波碎石術%輸尿管鏡下碎石術%經皮腎碎石術
상단수뇨관결석%체외충격파쇄석술%수뇨관경하쇄석술%경피신쇄석술
Upper segment ureteral calculi%Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy%Ureteroscope recessivelithotrity%Minimally invasive percutanenephrolithotomy
目的 探讨治疗上段输尿管结石的最佳方法.方法 选取我院2010年3月至2014年10月收治的126例上段输尿管结石患者,随机分为三组,A组采用体外冲击波碎石术(Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,ESWL),B组采用经尿道输尿管镜下碎石术(ureteroscope recessivelithotrity,URL),C组采用微创经皮肾碎石术(minimally invasive percutanenephrolithotomy,MPCNL).结果 三组病例均通过微创手术治疗成功.三组治疗效果比较,MPCNL组的结石总清除率明显高于URL组和ESWL组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而手术导致输尿管梗阻高烧、感染性休克、大出血、肾损害、结石残留等并发症发生率三组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 以上三种微创治疗上段输尿管结石方法均为有效手段,经URL手术适应于有指症上段输尿管结石.MPCNL治疗腰3以上复杂结石具有优势.ESWL应掌握好适应证,根据患者的具体病情合理选择或联合应用可代替开放性手术、减少并发症、提高疗效.
目的 探討治療上段輸尿管結石的最佳方法.方法 選取我院2010年3月至2014年10月收治的126例上段輸尿管結石患者,隨機分為三組,A組採用體外遲擊波碎石術(Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,ESWL),B組採用經尿道輸尿管鏡下碎石術(ureteroscope recessivelithotrity,URL),C組採用微創經皮腎碎石術(minimally invasive percutanenephrolithotomy,MPCNL).結果 三組病例均通過微創手術治療成功.三組治療效果比較,MPCNL組的結石總清除率明顯高于URL組和ESWL組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而手術導緻輸尿管梗阻高燒、感染性休剋、大齣血、腎損害、結石殘留等併髮癥髮生率三組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 以上三種微創治療上段輸尿管結石方法均為有效手段,經URL手術適應于有指癥上段輸尿管結石.MPCNL治療腰3以上複雜結石具有優勢.ESWL應掌握好適應證,根據患者的具體病情閤理選擇或聯閤應用可代替開放性手術、減少併髮癥、提高療效.
목적 탐토치료상단수뇨관결석적최가방법.방법 선취아원2010년3월지2014년10월수치적126례상단수뇨관결석환자,수궤분위삼조,A조채용체외충격파쇄석술(Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,ESWL),B조채용경뇨도수뇨관경하쇄석술(ureteroscope recessivelithotrity,URL),C조채용미창경피신쇄석술(minimally invasive percutanenephrolithotomy,MPCNL).결과 삼조병례균통과미창수술치료성공.삼조치료효과비교,MPCNL조적결석총청제솔명현고우URL조화ESWL조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이수술도치수뇨관경조고소、감염성휴극、대출혈、신손해、결석잔류등병발증발생솔삼조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 이상삼충미창치료상단수뇨관결석방법균위유효수단,경URL수술괄응우유지증상단수뇨관결석.MPCNL치료요3이상복잡결석구유우세.ESWL응장악호괄응증,근거환자적구체병정합리선택혹연합응용가대체개방성수술、감소병발증、제고료효.
Objective To explore the best way for treating upper segment ureteral calculi.Methods 126 patients with upper segment ureteral calculi admitted into our hospital from March,2010 to October,2014 were selected and randomly divided into three group A,group B,and group C,42 cases for each group.Group A were treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL),group B transurethral ureteroscopy lithotripsy (URL),and group C minimally invasive percutaneous renal lithotripsy (MPCNL).Results All patients in these three groups were successfully treated by minimally invasive surgery.The total calculi clearance rate was obviously higher in group C than in group A and group B,with statistical differences (P<0.05).There were no statistical differences in the incidences of complications such as high ureteral obstruction caursed by operation,septic shock,hemorrhage,renal damage,calculi residual,etc.between these 3 groups(P>0.05).Conclusions The three methods for upper segment ureteral calculi are effective.URL is a choice for upper segment ureteral calculi with indication and MPCNL for upper segment ureteral calculi above Lumbar 3.ESWL should be used under the condition that understanding the indications well.According to the patients' specific disease conditions,one or more of these three methods can be chosen to replace open surgery,so to reduce the surgical complications and improve the curative effect.