CAJ | 학술논문

当前，各类突发事件呈现出跨部门、跨区域的特点，由单一部门或地方政府来应对如此复杂的突发事件显然非常困难，因此应当破除传统“行政区行政”的治理理念，采取区域协同合作行为，发挥自身的优势，借助相互的资源，共同抵御灾难。我国应急管理政府间合作主要集中在省级政府，因此建立健全省级政府应急管理协作机制具有重要意义。通过比较研究我国的《泛珠三角区域内地九省（区）应急管理合作协议》与美国的《州际应急管理互助协议》（EMAC）在体制、法制和机制三个方面的差异，发现我国省级政府的应急管理行政合作协议存在缺乏独立权威的协调管理机构、缺乏法律保障和法律权威、跨区域应急预案体系与灾后补偿机制亟需完善、人才队伍建设任重道远等问题，要借鉴 EMAC 的先进经验，结合现实国情完善我国省级政府间应急管理协同合作。
당전，각류돌발사건정현출과부문、과구역적특점，유단일부문혹지방정부래응대여차복잡적돌발사건현연비상곤난，인차응당파제전통“행정구행정”적치리이념，채취구역협동합작행위，발휘자신적우세，차조상호적자원，공동저어재난。아국응급관리정부간합작주요집중재성급정부，인차건립건전성급정부응급관리협작궤제구유중요의의。통과비교연구아국적《범주삼각구역내지구성（구）응급관리합작협의》여미국적《주제응급관리호조협의》（EMAC）재체제、법제화궤제삼개방면적차이，발현아국성급정부적응급관리행정합작협의존재결핍독립권위적협조관리궤구、결핍법률보장화법률권위、과구역응급예안체계여재후보상궤제극수완선、인재대오건설임중도원등문제，요차감 EMAC 적선진경험，결합현실국정완선아국성급정부간응급관리협동합작。
At present, various emergencies are becoming inter-departmental and inter-regional, which is difficult to deal with for single department or government. Thus, we should abandon the restricting administrative philosophy but choose regional collaboration with resource sharing and mutual aid. In China, government collaboration is often at provincial level, so promoting provincial government emergency management collaboration is of great significance. In the case of Collaborative Agreement for Emergency Management among Nine Mainland Provinces (Autonomous Regions) in Pan Pearl River Delta (PPRD) and Emergency Management Assistance Compact, the paper mainly makes comparative study between China and the United States on institution, mechanism and legislation, finding out that we are lack of independent authority for coordination, legal protection, cross-regional emergency plan system, compensation mechanism and human resource management, so that we can learn advanced experience from the U.S. and improve China’s provincial government emergency management collaboration according to real situations.