邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)
邵暘學院學報(社會科學版)
소양학원학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Shaoyang University (Social Science Edition)
2015年
4期
66-73
,共8页
法治政府%法律信仰%科学立法%严格执法
法治政府%法律信仰%科學立法%嚴格執法
법치정부%법률신앙%과학입법%엄격집법
the government under the rule of law%legal faith%scientific legislation%strict law en-forcement
党的十八大和十八届四中全会明确提出要加强法治政府的建设,在法治政府建设过程中,我们面临的挑战主要有:公民和政府公职人员的法律信仰和法治意识的缺失;行政立法和行政决策尚未实现科学化、民主化和法治化;行政执法不严格、自由裁量权没有加以很好地规范;司法机关的审判权未能独立行使、没有很好地实现司法权对行政权的监督等。就我国的现状而言,要建成法治政府应采取以下几方面的措施:将公职人员的思想观念从人治思想的桎梏中解放出来,树立法律信仰和法治意识;进一步建立和健全行政决策程序和责任追究的法律法规;建立行政执法责任制对行政执法的自由裁量权加以规制;深化司法体制改革,确保法院能够独立审理行政案件以此制约行政权力的滥用。
黨的十八大和十八屆四中全會明確提齣要加彊法治政府的建設,在法治政府建設過程中,我們麵臨的挑戰主要有:公民和政府公職人員的法律信仰和法治意識的缺失;行政立法和行政決策尚未實現科學化、民主化和法治化;行政執法不嚴格、自由裁量權沒有加以很好地規範;司法機關的審判權未能獨立行使、沒有很好地實現司法權對行政權的鑑督等。就我國的現狀而言,要建成法治政府應採取以下幾方麵的措施:將公職人員的思想觀唸從人治思想的桎梏中解放齣來,樹立法律信仰和法治意識;進一步建立和健全行政決策程序和責任追究的法律法規;建立行政執法責任製對行政執法的自由裁量權加以規製;深化司法體製改革,確保法院能夠獨立審理行政案件以此製約行政權力的濫用。
당적십팔대화십팔계사중전회명학제출요가강법치정부적건설,재법치정부건설과정중,아문면림적도전주요유:공민화정부공직인원적법률신앙화법치의식적결실;행정입법화행정결책상미실현과학화、민주화화법치화;행정집법불엄격、자유재량권몰유가이흔호지규범;사법궤관적심판권미능독립행사、몰유흔호지실현사법권대행정권적감독등。취아국적현상이언,요건성법치정부응채취이하궤방면적조시:장공직인원적사상관념종인치사상적질곡중해방출래,수입법률신앙화법치의식;진일보건립화건전행정결책정서화책임추구적법율법규;건립행정집법책임제대행정집법적자유재량권가이규제;심화사법체제개혁,학보법원능구독립심리행정안건이차제약행정권력적람용。
The 18 th session of congress of the communist party of China and fourth plenary session of congress put forward to strengthen the construction of government by law clearly.In the process of the construction, the challenges which we face mainly include: most citizens, especially the civil servants lack of legal faith and the rule of law consciousness; administrative decision—making is not scientific and democratic enough; administrative law enforcement is not strict, at the same time the discretion in enforcement is not regulated properly; jurisdiction is not independently exercised; and executive power is not properly supervised by judicial power.As far as China is concerned, in order to achieve the goal of construction of the government ruled by law, we must try our best to solve the problems in the following aspects:to require the civil servants to set up the legal faith and the rule of law consciousness; to improve administrative decision—making procedures and accountability; to regulate the discretion of the administrative law enforcement;to deepen the reform of the judicial system and ensure that the court can handle independently administrative cases to restrict the abuse of administrative power.