CAJ | 학술논문

科技期刊审稿工作关系着科技期刊的质量。文章论述了：科技期刊应建立“三审”制；专家审稿的作用可以归纳为以下几个方面：剔除不符合办刊宗旨的稿件，剔除质量不高以及缺乏创新价值的稿件，剔除伪科学的稿件，严把期刊的质量关，对稿件的不足之处，提出修改意见，提高审稿人的学术水准，审稿人可以通过稿件中的大量专业的最新科学技术内容，拓展自己的专业领域；编辑部应做好稿件初审工作减轻专家审稿工作量；建立审稿专家的动态数据库，选准审稿专家并及时与之联系；审稿重点为稿件内容的创新性、科学性和实用性，文字内容，编写格式标准化等。相关专家的审稿是保证论文学术质量的关键环节和重要手段，提高审稿质量，进而可提高刊物的学术水平。
과기기간심고공작관계착과기기간적질량。문장논술료：과기기간응건립“삼심”제；전가심고적작용가이귀납위이하궤개방면：척제불부합판간종지적고건，척제질량불고이급결핍창신개치적고건，척제위과학적고건，엄파기간적질량관，대고건적불족지처，제출수개의견，제고심고인적학술수준，심고인가이통과고건중적대량전업적최신과학기술내용，탁전자기적전업영역；편집부응주호고건초심공작감경전가심고공작량；건립심고전가적동태수거고，선준심고전가병급시여지련계；심고중점위고건내용적창신성、과학성화실용성，문자내용，편사격식표준화등。상관전가적심고시보증논문학술질량적관건배절화중요수단，제고심고질량，진이가제고간물적학술수평。
The working relationship between thequalityof Sci-tech Journalsof science and technology periodical.This paper discusses:science journalsshould establish”three investigation”system,the role ofexpertreviewerscan be summarized as the following aspects:to eliminate notcomply with thepurposesandnot forpublished in this printmanuscript;removing the qualityis not high,the lack of innovation value of themanuscript;excluding pseudoscientificmanuscripts,strictperiodicalsqualitydeficiency;placeo n the manuscript,proposed amendments;improve thereviewer’sacademic standards;reviewerscan be updated through thecontents of a large number ofprofessionalscience and technologyin the manuscript,expandtheir areas of expertise;the editorial departmentshould do theeditors’workto alleviatethe workloadreviewers;dynamic databaseof peer reviewers;selectreviewersand timelycontact;reviewthe focus for themanuscript contentinnovation,scientific and practical,text,writing formatstandardization.Related experts toreviewis thekey linkand important meansto ensure theacademic quality of papers,to improve the quality of the review,whichcan improve theacademic level ofjournal.