中国药业
中國藥業
중국약업
China Pharmaceuticals
2015年
17期
113-114
,共2页
经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管%乳腺癌%临床疗效%生存质量%依从性%药品不良反应
經外週靜脈置入中心靜脈導管%乳腺癌%臨床療效%生存質量%依從性%藥品不良反應
경외주정맥치입중심정맥도관%유선암%림상료효%생존질량%의종성%약품불량반응
PICC%breast cancer%clinical efficacy%quality of life%comPliance%adverse reaction
目的：探讨不同给药途径对乳腺癌患者化学治疗(简称化疗)效果的影响，并总结护理要点。方法选择2013年1月至2014年12月医院收治的乳腺癌患者64例，随机分为对照组和观察组，各32例。两组患者均给予FPC化疗方案，对照组采用常规静脉输注，观察组采用经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管（PICC）给药，分别给予相应的护理方案。两组患者均以4周为1个疗程，治疗6个疗程。结果观察组总有效率为78.12％，对照组总有效率为71.88％，差异无统计学意义（ P＞0.05）。治疗后，观察组生存质量卡氏评分、化疗依从性以及对护理的满意度均显著优于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）。两组不良反应均较轻，差异不具有统计学意义（ P＞0.05）。结论针对乳腺癌化疗患者，采用PICC方式给药并结合相应护理方案，临床疗效好，可提高患者生存质量，有效改善化疗依从性，患者总体满意度高，且不增加不良反应的发生率，值得推广。
目的：探討不同給藥途徑對乳腺癌患者化學治療(簡稱化療)效果的影響，併總結護理要點。方法選擇2013年1月至2014年12月醫院收治的乳腺癌患者64例，隨機分為對照組和觀察組，各32例。兩組患者均給予FPC化療方案，對照組採用常規靜脈輸註，觀察組採用經外週靜脈置入中心靜脈導管（PICC）給藥，分彆給予相應的護理方案。兩組患者均以4週為1箇療程，治療6箇療程。結果觀察組總有效率為78.12％，對照組總有效率為71.88％，差異無統計學意義（ P＞0.05）。治療後，觀察組生存質量卡氏評分、化療依從性以及對護理的滿意度均顯著優于對照組，差異具有統計學意義（ P＜0.05）。兩組不良反應均較輕，差異不具有統計學意義（ P＞0.05）。結論針對乳腺癌化療患者，採用PICC方式給藥併結閤相應護理方案，臨床療效好，可提高患者生存質量，有效改善化療依從性，患者總體滿意度高，且不增加不良反應的髮生率，值得推廣。
목적：탐토불동급약도경대유선암환자화학치료(간칭화료)효과적영향，병총결호리요점。방법선택2013년1월지2014년12월의원수치적유선암환자64례，수궤분위대조조화관찰조，각32례。량조환자균급여FPC화료방안，대조조채용상규정맥수주，관찰조채용경외주정맥치입중심정맥도관（PICC）급약，분별급여상응적호리방안。량조환자균이4주위1개료정，치료6개료정。결과관찰조총유효솔위78.12％，대조조총유효솔위71.88％，차이무통계학의의（ P＞0.05）。치료후，관찰조생존질량잡씨평분、화료의종성이급대호리적만의도균현저우우대조조，차이구유통계학의의（ P＜0.05）。량조불량반응균교경，차이불구유통계학의의（ P＞0.05）。결론침대유선암화료환자，채용PICC방식급약병결합상응호리방안，림상료효호，가제고환자생존질량，유효개선화료의종성，환자총체만의도고，차불증가불량반응적발생솔，치득추엄。
Objective To investigate the effect of chemotheraPy of different routes of administration in treating breast cancer and its nursing measures. Methods 64 cases of breast cancer in the hosPital from January 2013 to December 2014 were chosen and randomly divided into the control grouP and the observation grouP,32 cases in each grouP. Two grouPs of Patients were given FPC chemotheraPy, the control grouP was given conventional intravenous infusion,the observation grouP was given PeriPheral vein imPlanted central venous catheter ( PICC ) administration;both grouPs received aPProPriate nursing measure. Two grouPs of Patients received 6 couse of treatment, four weeks for one course. Results The total effective rate of the observation grouP was 78. 12% ,while the control grouP was 71. 88%,and there was no statistical difference ( P > 0. 05 ) . After treatment,the quality of life karnofsky score,chemotheraPy comPli-ance,and satisfaction with care of observation grouP were significantly better than the control grouP,the difference was statistical differ-ence ( P < 0. 05 ) . The incidence of adverse reactions was slight in the two grouPs,with no statistical difference ( P > 0. 05 ) . Conclusion Using PICC combined with aPProPriate nursing on breast cancer Patients accePted chemotheraPy,can imProve the quality of life,comPli-ance of treatment and nursing satisfaction,and the incidence of adverse reactions does not increase,is worth of clinical aPPlication.
