中国土地科学
中國土地科學
중국토지과학
China Land Science
2015年
8期
49-54
,共6页
张菡冰%李翔%柳乾坤%靳相木
張菡冰%李翔%柳乾坤%靳相木
장함빙%리상%류건곤%근상목
土地制度%宅基地%成员权%物权
土地製度%宅基地%成員權%物權
토지제도%택기지%성원권%물권
land institution%rural residential land%membership%property right
研究目的:通过对宅基地使用权身份化和物权化“两化复合”结构的事实关系进行理论提炼,揭示宅基地制度改革的基本取向。研究方法:文献梳理法、综合分析法。研究结果:以身份化为内核、以“一户一宅”为表达形式的宅基地制度,保障了13亿人口大国的最大群体、最弱势群体的居住正义,但同时宅基地使用权的身份化“绑架”了物权化,使宅基地使用权无法成为真正的用益物权。宅基地制度改革的基本取向是去身份化,但面临着市场化流转和住房保障的两难困境。研究结论:以继承环节去身份化作为宅基地使用权去身份化改革的突破口,积累经验之后,再沿着“管住增量—调整存量—双轨管理”的思路,分阶段、按区域、有步骤地推进宅基地使用权的去身份化改革。
研究目的:通過對宅基地使用權身份化和物權化“兩化複閤”結構的事實關繫進行理論提煉,揭示宅基地製度改革的基本取嚮。研究方法:文獻梳理法、綜閤分析法。研究結果:以身份化為內覈、以“一戶一宅”為錶達形式的宅基地製度,保障瞭13億人口大國的最大群體、最弱勢群體的居住正義,但同時宅基地使用權的身份化“綁架”瞭物權化,使宅基地使用權無法成為真正的用益物權。宅基地製度改革的基本取嚮是去身份化,但麵臨著市場化流轉和住房保障的兩難睏境。研究結論:以繼承環節去身份化作為宅基地使用權去身份化改革的突破口,積纍經驗之後,再沿著“管住增量—調整存量—雙軌管理”的思路,分階段、按區域、有步驟地推進宅基地使用權的去身份化改革。
연구목적:통과대택기지사용권신빈화화물권화“량화복합”결구적사실관계진행이론제련,게시택기지제도개혁적기본취향。연구방법:문헌소리법、종합분석법。연구결과:이신빈화위내핵、이“일호일택”위표체형식적택기지제도,보장료13억인구대국적최대군체、최약세군체적거주정의,단동시택기지사용권적신빈화“방가”료물권화,사택기지사용권무법성위진정적용익물권。택기지제도개혁적기본취향시거신빈화,단면림착시장화류전화주방보장적량난곤경。연구결론:이계승배절거신빈화작위택기지사용권거신빈화개혁적돌파구,적루경험지후,재연착“관주증량—조정존량—쌍궤관리”적사로,분계단、안구역、유보취지추진택기지사용권적거신빈화개혁。
The purpose of this paper is to refine the relationship between identification and the combined nature of the property right of rural residential land use right theoretically, aiming at revealing the basic orientation of rural residential land system. Literature review method and comprehensive analysis method are employed. The result indicates that the rural residential land system secures the residential safety of peasant in China, by taking identification as its core and the principal of“one household, one housing land”as its manifestation. But at the same time, identification restrains rural residential land use right from being a real usufruct property right. The basic orientation of the reform of the rural residential land use right is therefore disidentification, but it faces the dilemma of the market circulation and the housing security. The conclusion of this paper is that the disidentification-oriented reform of rural residential land system should begin at the point of rural residential land use right inheritance, and then, gradually remove identification nature from rural residential land use right. And finally, by taking the way of controlling increment and adjusting stock(regulated within two tracks), we may promote the disidentification reform of rural residential land use right step by step.