中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
24期
81-82
,共2页
牙周炎%牙列缺损%夹板式黏结桥
牙週炎%牙列缺損%夾闆式黏結橋
아주염%아렬결손%협판식점결교
Periodontitis%Denture defect%Splinted fixed prostheses
目的:分析和研究使用夹板式黏结桥对牙周炎伴牙列缺损修复的有效性。方法随机随机选取该院2013年10月-2015年1月期间被诊断为牙周炎伴牙列缺损并进行治疗的患者50例作为研究对象,根据患者病情完成80件牙周。按照随机对照的原则分为使用夹板式黏结桥修复治疗的观察组25例40件牙周,使用传统方法进行治疗的对照组25例40件牙周,对两组患者治疗后的疗效进行统计分析。结果观察组患者修复半年以后,修复成功率为38/40(95.0%),修复1年以后,成功率为修复成功率为32/40(80.0%)。对照组患者修复半年以后,修复成功率为34/40(80.5%),修复1年以后,成功率为修复成功率为28/40(70.0%)。两组进行对比,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论使用夹板式黏结桥进行有关牙周炎伴牙列缺损疾病的修复,拥有较好的效果,值得在临床上进行大力的推广应用。
目的:分析和研究使用夾闆式黏結橋對牙週炎伴牙列缺損脩複的有效性。方法隨機隨機選取該院2013年10月-2015年1月期間被診斷為牙週炎伴牙列缺損併進行治療的患者50例作為研究對象,根據患者病情完成80件牙週。按照隨機對照的原則分為使用夾闆式黏結橋脩複治療的觀察組25例40件牙週,使用傳統方法進行治療的對照組25例40件牙週,對兩組患者治療後的療效進行統計分析。結果觀察組患者脩複半年以後,脩複成功率為38/40(95.0%),脩複1年以後,成功率為脩複成功率為32/40(80.0%)。對照組患者脩複半年以後,脩複成功率為34/40(80.5%),脩複1年以後,成功率為脩複成功率為28/40(70.0%)。兩組進行對比,其差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論使用夾闆式黏結橋進行有關牙週炎伴牙列缺損疾病的脩複,擁有較好的效果,值得在臨床上進行大力的推廣應用。
목적:분석화연구사용협판식점결교대아주염반아렬결손수복적유효성。방법수궤수궤선취해원2013년10월-2015년1월기간피진단위아주염반아렬결손병진행치료적환자50례작위연구대상,근거환자병정완성80건아주。안조수궤대조적원칙분위사용협판식점결교수복치료적관찰조25례40건아주,사용전통방법진행치료적대조조25례40건아주,대량조환자치료후적료효진행통계분석。결과관찰조환자수복반년이후,수복성공솔위38/40(95.0%),수복1년이후,성공솔위수복성공솔위32/40(80.0%)。대조조환자수복반년이후,수복성공솔위34/40(80.5%),수복1년이후,성공솔위수복성공솔위28/40(70.0%)。량조진행대비,기차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론사용협판식점결교진행유관아주염반아렬결손질병적수복,옹유교호적효과,치득재림상상진행대력적추엄응용。
Objective To analyze the effectiveness of splinted fixed prostheses on restoration of periodontitis combined with den-ture defect. Methods 50 patients with periodontitis combined with denture defect confirmed and treated in our hospital between October 2013 and January 2015 were selected as the research object, for whom 80 restorations were done. All the patients were randomized into observation group in which the 25 patients (40 restorations) were treated with splinted fixed prostheses, and con-trol group in which the 25 patients (40 restorations) were treated with traditional method. The curative effects were compared be-tween the two groups based on statistical analysis. Results The success rate was 38/40(95.0%)0.5 year after restoration and 32/40(80.0%)1 year after in the observation group, while in the control group, it was 34/40(80.5%)and 28/40(70.0%)respectively, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant, P<0.05. Conclusion Splinted fixed prostheses is worthy of pro-motion in the restoration of periodontitis combined with denture defect due to its good effect.