医学临床研究
醫學臨床研究
의학림상연구
Journal of Clinical Research
2015年
7期
1331-1335
,共5页
臭氧/投药和剂量%脊柱疾病/并发症%腰痛/病因学%腰痛/治疗
臭氧/投藥和劑量%脊柱疾病/併髮癥%腰痛/病因學%腰痛/治療
취양/투약화제량%척주질병/병발증%요통/병인학%요통/치료
Ozone/AD%Spinal Diseases/CO%Low Back Pain/ET%Low Back Pain/T H
【目的】探讨使用不同容量臭氧治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛患者的疗效。【方法】选取2013年8月至2014年8月本院住院的下腰痛患者作为研究对象,按纳入及排除标准,共103例进入本研究,并按照椎间盘造影显示造影剂流入的范围结果将患者分为三组:A组(造影剂流入外层纤维环)计33例,B组(造影剂流出至纤维环外层)计34例,C组(造影剂流出至硬膜外隙)计36例,每组患者随机注入5~20 m L臭氧,比较各组患者注入不同容量臭氧后的疗效。【结果】各分组中注入10 m L、15 m L、20 m L间行组内疗效比较,其有效率相比较差异无显著性(P >0.05),但注入10~20mL组其有效率远高于注入5mL者,且差异有显著性(P<0.05)。【结论】对于各种损伤程度的椎间盘而言,选择注入10~20 m L的臭氧量均是有效的注射剂量,且对于椎间盘造影2级者,注入10 m L臭氧可取得最佳的显效率且较不易损伤纤维环诱发腰部或下肢疼痛,对于椎间盘造影3级者注射15 m L臭氧同样可达到最佳显效率。
【目的】探討使用不同容量臭氧治療椎間盤源性下腰痛患者的療效。【方法】選取2013年8月至2014年8月本院住院的下腰痛患者作為研究對象,按納入及排除標準,共103例進入本研究,併按照椎間盤造影顯示造影劑流入的範圍結果將患者分為三組:A組(造影劑流入外層纖維環)計33例,B組(造影劑流齣至纖維環外層)計34例,C組(造影劑流齣至硬膜外隙)計36例,每組患者隨機註入5~20 m L臭氧,比較各組患者註入不同容量臭氧後的療效。【結果】各分組中註入10 m L、15 m L、20 m L間行組內療效比較,其有效率相比較差異無顯著性(P >0.05),但註入10~20mL組其有效率遠高于註入5mL者,且差異有顯著性(P<0.05)。【結論】對于各種損傷程度的椎間盤而言,選擇註入10~20 m L的臭氧量均是有效的註射劑量,且對于椎間盤造影2級者,註入10 m L臭氧可取得最佳的顯效率且較不易損傷纖維環誘髮腰部或下肢疼痛,對于椎間盤造影3級者註射15 m L臭氧同樣可達到最佳顯效率。
【목적】탐토사용불동용량취양치료추간반원성하요통환자적료효。【방법】선취2013년8월지2014년8월본원주원적하요통환자작위연구대상,안납입급배제표준,공103례진입본연구,병안조추간반조영현시조영제류입적범위결과장환자분위삼조:A조(조영제류입외층섬유배)계33례,B조(조영제류출지섬유배외층)계34례,C조(조영제류출지경막외극)계36례,매조환자수궤주입5~20 m L취양,비교각조환자주입불동용량취양후적료효。【결과】각분조중주입10 m L、15 m L、20 m L간행조내료효비교,기유효솔상비교차이무현저성(P >0.05),단주입10~20mL조기유효솔원고우주입5mL자,차차이유현저성(P<0.05)。【결론】대우각충손상정도적추간반이언,선택주입10~20 m L적취양량균시유효적주사제량,차대우추간반조영2급자,주입10 m L취양가취득최가적현효솔차교불역손상섬유배유발요부혹하지동통,대우추간반조영3급자주사15 m L취양동양가체도최가현효솔。
[Objective] To explore the efficacies by using different capacities of ozone in patients with dis‐cogenic low back pain (DLBP) .[Methods] From August 2013 to August 2014 at our hospital ,a total of 103 eligible DLBP patients were recruited and divided into three groups according to the results of discography . That is ,group A (flow of contrast medium into outer annulus fibrosus) ,group B (flow of contrast medium flows out of outer annulus fibrosus) ,group C (flow of contrast medium into epidural space) .And 5~20 ml o‐zone was randomly injected into each patient .The efficacies of each group were compared .[Results] When 5 ml was compared with 10 ,15 ,20 ml in each group ,there were statistically significant differences in efficacy ( P >0 .05) .When 10 ,15 ,20 ml were compared ,no statistically significant differences existed in efficacy ( P <0 .05) .And the efficacies of 10~20 ml ozone were much higher than those of 5 ml .[Conclusion] For various degrees of disc damage ,an injection dose of 10~20 ml ozone is effective .For group B ,an injection of 10 ml ozone may achieve the best efficacy and reduce damage to annulus so as to avoid inducing waist or leg pain .For group C ,an injection of 15 ml ozone is similarly effective .