医学临床研究
醫學臨床研究
의학림상연구
Journal of Clinical Research
2015年
7期
1296-1298,1301
,共4页
徐敏%朱美琴%白桦%陈亦欣%申维玺
徐敏%硃美琴%白樺%陳亦訢%申維璽
서민%주미금%백화%진역흔%신유새
结直肠肿瘤/药物疗法%抗肿瘤药/治疗应用%氟尿嘧啶/治疗应用%氟尿嘧啶/类似物和衍生物%抗肿瘤联合化疗方案
結直腸腫瘤/藥物療法%抗腫瘤藥/治療應用%氟尿嘧啶/治療應用%氟尿嘧啶/類似物和衍生物%抗腫瘤聯閤化療方案
결직장종류/약물요법%항종류약/치료응용%불뇨밀정/치료응용%불뇨밀정/유사물화연생물%항종류연합화료방안
Colorectal Neoplasms/DT%Antineoplastic Agents/TU%Fluorouracil/TU%Fluoroura-cil/AA%Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
【目的】比较改良IRIS方案与经典FOLFIRI方案治疗晚期结直肠癌(mCRC)的近期疗效及其毒副反应。【方法】选择2011年3月至2012年9月本院收治的64例mCRC患者,将其随机分配为观察组( n=32)和对照组( n =32)。观察组接受改良IRIS方案伊立替康(CPT‐11)联合滞后2 d服用替吉奥(S‐1),对照组接受标准FOLFIRI方案,观察两组化疗的毒副反应并评价化疗疗效。【结果】①疗效:两组患者RR、DCR无显著性差异( P >0.05)。②毒副反应:两组方案最常见为骨髓抑制、厌食、疲劳、恶心呕吐、腹泻等,多为Ⅰ~Ⅱ度,Ⅲ度毒性反应少见,无Ⅳ度不良反应发生。其中对照组Ⅲ度粒细胞减少、恶心呕吐较实验组更严重,差别有统计学意义(P <0.05)。③生存期:实验组和对照组的无进展生存期为8.2个月和7.9个月,中位生存期为21.8个月和21.4个月,差异均无统计学意义( P >0.05)。【结论】改良IRIS方案治疗mCRC近期临床疗效较好,毒副反应可以耐受,生存期不亚于采用标准FOLFIRI方案治疗的患者,值得临床推广。
【目的】比較改良IRIS方案與經典FOLFIRI方案治療晚期結直腸癌(mCRC)的近期療效及其毒副反應。【方法】選擇2011年3月至2012年9月本院收治的64例mCRC患者,將其隨機分配為觀察組( n=32)和對照組( n =32)。觀察組接受改良IRIS方案伊立替康(CPT‐11)聯閤滯後2 d服用替吉奧(S‐1),對照組接受標準FOLFIRI方案,觀察兩組化療的毒副反應併評價化療療效。【結果】①療效:兩組患者RR、DCR無顯著性差異( P >0.05)。②毒副反應:兩組方案最常見為骨髓抑製、厭食、疲勞、噁心嘔吐、腹瀉等,多為Ⅰ~Ⅱ度,Ⅲ度毒性反應少見,無Ⅳ度不良反應髮生。其中對照組Ⅲ度粒細胞減少、噁心嘔吐較實驗組更嚴重,差彆有統計學意義(P <0.05)。③生存期:實驗組和對照組的無進展生存期為8.2箇月和7.9箇月,中位生存期為21.8箇月和21.4箇月,差異均無統計學意義( P >0.05)。【結論】改良IRIS方案治療mCRC近期臨床療效較好,毒副反應可以耐受,生存期不亞于採用標準FOLFIRI方案治療的患者,值得臨床推廣。
【목적】비교개량IRIS방안여경전FOLFIRI방안치료만기결직장암(mCRC)적근기료효급기독부반응。【방법】선택2011년3월지2012년9월본원수치적64례mCRC환자,장기수궤분배위관찰조( n=32)화대조조( n =32)。관찰조접수개량IRIS방안이립체강(CPT‐11)연합체후2 d복용체길오(S‐1),대조조접수표준FOLFIRI방안,관찰량조화료적독부반응병평개화료료효。【결과】①료효:량조환자RR、DCR무현저성차이( P >0.05)。②독부반응:량조방안최상견위골수억제、염식、피로、악심구토、복사등,다위Ⅰ~Ⅱ도,Ⅲ도독성반응소견,무Ⅳ도불량반응발생。기중대조조Ⅲ도립세포감소、악심구토교실험조경엄중,차별유통계학의의(P <0.05)。③생존기:실험조화대조조적무진전생존기위8.2개월화7.9개월,중위생존기위21.8개월화21.4개월,차이균무통계학의의( P >0.05)。【결론】개량IRIS방안치료mCRC근기림상료효교호,독부반응가이내수,생존기불아우채용표준FOLFIRI방안치료적환자,치득림상추엄。
[Objective] To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of modified irinotecan plus S‐1 (IRIS) regimen versus classic FOLFIRI in the treatment of distant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) .[Methods] From March 2011 to September 2012 ,a total of 64 mCRC patients were randomly divided into experimental (modi‐fied IRIS ,n = 32) and control (FOLFIRI ,n = 32) groups .The experimental group received modified IRIS while the control group standard FOLFIRI .Adverse reaction and chemotherapeutic efficacy were examined .[Results] No significant inter‐group difference existed in response rate (RR) or disease control rate (DCR) ( P >0 .05) .The major toxicities included myelosuppression ,anorexia ,fatigue ,nausea ,vomiting and diar‐rhea ,etc .There was no grade 4 toxicity .Grade 3 toxicities of neutrocytopenia and vomiting were more com‐mon in control group than experiment group ( P <0 .05) .The progression‐free and overall survivals showed no significant inter‐group difference ( P >0 .05) .[Conclusion] The modified IRIS regimen (CPT‐11+S‐1) is both safe and efficacious for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer .Progression‐free survival and overall survival for IRIS is non‐inferior to those for FOLFIRI .Toxic and adverse effects are tolerable and long‐term effects deserve further evaluations .