安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
2015年
9期
1316-1319
,共4页
Stroop色词测验%主观认知功能障碍%执行功能
Stroop色詞測驗%主觀認知功能障礙%執行功能
Stroop색사측험%주관인지공능장애%집행공능
stroop color-word test%subjective cognitive impairment%executive function
目的 评价改良中文版Stroop色词测验( CWT)在识别主观认知功能障碍( SCI)中的作用. 方法 选择36例以认知功能障碍为主诉的老人和35例正常老年人,进行一般资料问卷调查和神经心理学背景测试,包括简易精神状态量表( MMSE)、日常生活能力量表( ADL)、老年抑郁量表、数字广度、词表记忆等. 采用CWT对所有研究对象进行执行功能测试,分析指标包括错误数、平均反应时、反应干扰量( SIE)的指标反应时之差(即颜色与字义不一致和一致时的平均用时之差) ,并对SCI的CWT结果与年龄和记忆得分进行相关分析. 结果 两组被试者神经心理学背景测试差异无统计学意义. 与正常老年人相比, SCI组的CWT平均反应时、错误数、反应时之差均有显著差异. 平均反应时、错误数与年龄均呈显著正相关性. SCI组反应时之差较正常老年人明显延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0. 05),而其与年龄、错误数、平均反应时、总体认知功能以及记忆等相关检查之间的相关性均不显著. 结论 CWT能有效识别SCI,有一定的敏感性.
目的 評價改良中文版Stroop色詞測驗( CWT)在識彆主觀認知功能障礙( SCI)中的作用. 方法 選擇36例以認知功能障礙為主訴的老人和35例正常老年人,進行一般資料問捲調查和神經心理學揹景測試,包括簡易精神狀態量錶( MMSE)、日常生活能力量錶( ADL)、老年抑鬱量錶、數字廣度、詞錶記憶等. 採用CWT對所有研究對象進行執行功能測試,分析指標包括錯誤數、平均反應時、反應榦擾量( SIE)的指標反應時之差(即顏色與字義不一緻和一緻時的平均用時之差) ,併對SCI的CWT結果與年齡和記憶得分進行相關分析. 結果 兩組被試者神經心理學揹景測試差異無統計學意義. 與正常老年人相比, SCI組的CWT平均反應時、錯誤數、反應時之差均有顯著差異. 平均反應時、錯誤數與年齡均呈顯著正相關性. SCI組反應時之差較正常老年人明顯延長,差異有統計學意義(P<0. 05),而其與年齡、錯誤數、平均反應時、總體認知功能以及記憶等相關檢查之間的相關性均不顯著. 結論 CWT能有效識彆SCI,有一定的敏感性.
목적 평개개량중문판Stroop색사측험( CWT)재식별주관인지공능장애( SCI)중적작용. 방법 선택36례이인지공능장애위주소적노인화35례정상노년인,진행일반자료문권조사화신경심이학배경측시,포괄간역정신상태량표( MMSE)、일상생활능역량표( ADL)、노년억욱량표、수자엄도、사표기억등. 채용CWT대소유연구대상진행집행공능측시,분석지표포괄착오수、평균반응시、반응간우량( SIE)적지표반응시지차(즉안색여자의불일치화일치시적평균용시지차) ,병대SCI적CWT결과여년령화기억득분진행상관분석. 결과 량조피시자신경심이학배경측시차이무통계학의의. 여정상노년인상비, SCI조적CWT평균반응시、착오수、반응시지차균유현저차이. 평균반응시、착오수여년령균정현저정상관성. SCI조반응시지차교정상노년인명현연장,차이유통계학의의(P<0. 05),이기여년령、착오수、평균반응시、총체인지공능이급기억등상관검사지간적상관성균불현저. 결론 CWT능유효식별SCI,유일정적민감성.
Objective To investigate the applicability of Stroop color-word test in Chinese eldly patients with sub-jective cognitive impairment. Methods 36 patients with subjective cognitive impairment and 35 normal elders,all accepted general information questionaire( including age,gender,education,ect) ,Chinese version Stroop color-word test,background neuropsychological tests(MMSE,ADL,GDS,ect). Analysis of indicators included: the number of errors,average response,Stroop interference effects ( SIE)-Time difference of the Color inconsistencies and consist-ent with the meaning of words. At last we analyse relationship between CWT results and age,education,et al. Re-sults There were no significant differences in neuropsychological tests. Compared with normal subjects,subjective cognitive impairment subjects spent more time and made more errors in doing this task. They made statistical signifi-cance. The linear regression analysis between reaction time, the number of errors and overall cognitive function ( MMSE) , age, memory ( digit span, delayed recall) showed:the numbers of errors and the average response time had significant positive correlation with age. SIE of SCI was significantly longer than the normal control, the differ-ence was significant (P<0. 05). And it had no significant correlation with age, overall cognitive function and mem-ory and other related inspection. Conclusion Stroop color-word test has a certain sensitivity in recognition of sub-jective cognitive impairment elders.
