中国骨与关节杂志
中國骨與關節雜誌
중국골여관절잡지
Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
2015年
9期
717-719
,共3页
齐鹏%王征%刘保卫%宋凯%张永刚%王岩%崔赓
齊鵬%王徵%劉保衛%宋凱%張永剛%王巖%崔賡
제붕%왕정%류보위%송개%장영강%왕암%최갱
腰椎%脊柱融合术%治疗结果%脉冲射频术
腰椎%脊柱融閤術%治療結果%脈遲射頻術
요추%척주융합술%치료결과%맥충사빈술
Lumbar vertebrae%Spinal fusion%Treatment outcome%Pulsed radiofrequency treatment
目的:对比脉冲冲洗枪与传统冲洗方法在单节段腰椎后路椎体间融合术( posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF )手术中应用后的相关指标,评价脉冲冲洗枪对于单节段 PLIF 手术的有效性。方法将2013年1月至2014年11月共82例行单节段 PLIF 手术的患者,采用随机数字表法分为两组,研究组切口关闭前使用脉冲冲洗枪进行冲洗,对照组使用传统冲洗方法进行冲洗。比较两组患者术后连续3天体温、引流,连续3次血清学白细胞、C-反应蛋白( C-reactive protein,CRP )、红细胞沉降率( erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR )及术后出院天数的差异。结果两组患者术后连续3天体温、引流,连续3次血清学白细胞、CRP、ESR 及术后出院天数的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在单节段 PLIF 手术中,脉冲冲洗枪显示出较低的效价比,按照现代无菌原则进行操作,脉冲冲洗枪可以选择性使用,并非必需。
目的:對比脈遲遲洗鎗與傳統遲洗方法在單節段腰椎後路椎體間融閤術( posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF )手術中應用後的相關指標,評價脈遲遲洗鎗對于單節段 PLIF 手術的有效性。方法將2013年1月至2014年11月共82例行單節段 PLIF 手術的患者,採用隨機數字錶法分為兩組,研究組切口關閉前使用脈遲遲洗鎗進行遲洗,對照組使用傳統遲洗方法進行遲洗。比較兩組患者術後連續3天體溫、引流,連續3次血清學白細胞、C-反應蛋白( C-reactive protein,CRP )、紅細胞沉降率( erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR )及術後齣院天數的差異。結果兩組患者術後連續3天體溫、引流,連續3次血清學白細胞、CRP、ESR 及術後齣院天數的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論在單節段 PLIF 手術中,脈遲遲洗鎗顯示齣較低的效價比,按照現代無菌原則進行操作,脈遲遲洗鎗可以選擇性使用,併非必需。
목적:대비맥충충세창여전통충세방법재단절단요추후로추체간융합술( posterior lumbar interbody fusion,PLIF )수술중응용후적상관지표,평개맥충충세창대우단절단 PLIF 수술적유효성。방법장2013년1월지2014년11월공82례행단절단 PLIF 수술적환자,채용수궤수자표법분위량조,연구조절구관폐전사용맥충충세창진행충세,대조조사용전통충세방법진행충세。비교량조환자술후련속3천체온、인류,련속3차혈청학백세포、C-반응단백( C-reactive protein,CRP )、홍세포침강솔( erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR )급술후출원천수적차이。결과량조환자술후련속3천체온、인류,련속3차혈청학백세포、CRP、ESR 급술후출원천수적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론재단절단 PLIF 수술중,맥충충세창현시출교저적효개비,안조현대무균원칙진행조작,맥충충세창가이선택성사용,병비필수。
Objective To evaluate the clinical application and effects of SurgiLav Plus Irrigation System in the treatment of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion ( PLIF ).Methods From January, 2013 to November, 2014, 82 patients after one-level PLIF were divided into 2 groups under randomized method. SurgiLav Plus Irrigation System was applied in the study group before incision closure, while traditional method in the control group. Temperature and blood loss ( drain ) in consecutive 3 days postoperatively, serological leukocytes in consecutive 3 times postoperatively, C- reactive protein ( CRP ), erythrocyte sedimentation rate ( ESR ) and postoperative hospital stay were recorded and compared in both groups.Results There were no signiifcant differences between the study group and the control group in the index analyzed above (P>0.05 ).Conclusions In one-level PLIF surgery, SurgiLav Plus Irrigation System shows lower cost-effects ratio. According to modern aseptic principle, SurgiLav Plus Irrigation System is an alternative option rather than necessary.