国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
International Eye Science
2015年
10期
1789-1791
,共3页
屈光参差%弱视%儿童%综合治疗%相关因素
屈光參差%弱視%兒童%綜閤治療%相關因素
굴광삼차%약시%인동%종합치료%상관인소
anisometropia%amblyopia%children%comprehensive treatment%related factors
目的：探究影响屈光参差性患儿综合治疗效果的相关因素，为临床干预提供理论依据。<br> 方法：选取我院2013-10/2014-10间收治的100例屈光参差性弱视患儿，经过6~18 mo的治疗后根据治疗效果分为A、B、C三组， A 组54例，治疗效果判定为治愈；B 组34例，治疗效果判定为进步；C组12例，治疗效果判定为无效。对其年龄、依从性、屈光参差程度、屈光参差类型、弱视程度、注视性质进行分析。<br> 结果：三组患者之间屈光参差类型差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，而三组患者之间年龄、治疗依从性、屈光参差程度、弱视程度、注视性质相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。通过回归方程分析各因素对综合治疗效果影响程度依次为弱视程度、屈光参差程度、注视性质、年龄、依从性。<br> 结论：屈光参差性患儿综合治疗效果与年龄、治疗的依从性、屈光参差程度、弱视程度、注视性质密切相关，而与患儿的屈光参差类型无明显的相关性。
目的：探究影響屈光參差性患兒綜閤治療效果的相關因素，為臨床榦預提供理論依據。<br> 方法：選取我院2013-10/2014-10間收治的100例屈光參差性弱視患兒，經過6~18 mo的治療後根據治療效果分為A、B、C三組， A 組54例，治療效果判定為治愈；B 組34例，治療效果判定為進步；C組12例，治療效果判定為無效。對其年齡、依從性、屈光參差程度、屈光參差類型、弱視程度、註視性質進行分析。<br> 結果：三組患者之間屈光參差類型差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)，而三組患者之間年齡、治療依從性、屈光參差程度、弱視程度、註視性質相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。通過迴歸方程分析各因素對綜閤治療效果影響程度依次為弱視程度、屈光參差程度、註視性質、年齡、依從性。<br> 結論：屈光參差性患兒綜閤治療效果與年齡、治療的依從性、屈光參差程度、弱視程度、註視性質密切相關，而與患兒的屈光參差類型無明顯的相關性。
목적：탐구영향굴광삼차성환인종합치료효과적상관인소，위림상간예제공이론의거。<br> 방법：선취아원2013-10/2014-10간수치적100례굴광삼차성약시환인，경과6~18 mo적치료후근거치료효과분위A、B、C삼조， A 조54례，치료효과판정위치유；B 조34례，치료효과판정위진보；C조12례，치료효과판정위무효。대기년령、의종성、굴광삼차정도、굴광삼차류형、약시정도、주시성질진행분석。<br> 결과：삼조환자지간굴광삼차류형차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)，이삼조환자지간년령、치료의종성、굴광삼차정도、약시정도、주시성질상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。통과회귀방정분석각인소대종합치료효과영향정도의차위약시정도、굴광삼차정도、주시성질、년령、의종성。<br> 결론：굴광삼차성환인종합치료효과여년령、치료적의종성、굴광삼차정도、약시정도、주시성질밀절상관，이여환인적굴광삼차류형무명현적상관성。
AIM: To study the related factors of comprehensive treatment effect on anisometropic amblyopia children, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical intervention. <br> METHODS: Totally 100 cases of anisometropic amblyopia children in our hospital from October 2013 to October 2014 were selected and were divided into groups A, B and C according to curative effect after 6 ~ 18mo's treatment. Fifty-four cases of group A were judged to be cured, 34 cases of group B were judged to be improved, and 12 cases of group C was invalid. The age, compliance, anisometropia degree, anisometropia type, amblyopia degree and fixation behavior were analyzed. <br> RESULTS:Anisometropia type among the three groups of patients showed no significant difference (P>0. 05). While the age, compliance, anisometropia degree, amblyopia degree and fixation behavior among three groups of patients had statistically significant differences (P<0. 05). By regression equation analysis, the influence level of various factors on comprehensive treatment effect was in sequence of amblyopia degree, anisometropia degree, fixation behavior, age, compliance. <br> CONCLUSION: There are closed relationship between comprehensive treatment effect and age, compliance, anisometropia degree, amblyopia degree, fixation behavior, but there is no significant correlation between anisometropia type and comprehensive treatment effect.
