解放军医学院学报
解放軍醫學院學報
해방군의학원학보
Academic Journal of Chinese Pla Medical School
2015年
9期
950-952,956
,共4页
谭燕%潘越%朱丹%董月%施晓亚%谭秋华%苏凤霞
譚燕%潘越%硃丹%董月%施曉亞%譚鞦華%囌鳳霞
담연%반월%주단%동월%시효아%담추화%소봉하
《解放军医学院学报》%计量学%科技期刊评价
《解放軍醫學院學報》%計量學%科技期刊評價
《해방군의학원학보》%계량학%과기기간평개
AcademicJournal of Chinese PLA Medical School%bibliometrics%evaluation of scientific journals
目的 分析《解放军医学院学报》(以下简称《学报》)2009 - 2014年度主要计量学指标,为期刊发展方向提供决策依据.方法 参考2009 - 2014年度《中国科技期刊引证报告》,采用文献计量学方法对《学报》的总被引频次、基金论文比、平均引文数、他引率、综合评价总分和影响因子进行统计分析.结果 2009 - 2014年,《学报》总被引频次、平均引文数及综合评价总分均大幅上升,增幅分别达117.60%、141.32%及61.24%,基金论文比、他引率及影响因子均呈现波动模式.结论 2009 - 2014年,《学报》整体呈现良好的可持续发展势头,质量逐年提升,个别指标的波动也为本刊未来的发展指明了方向.
目的 分析《解放軍醫學院學報》(以下簡稱《學報》)2009 - 2014年度主要計量學指標,為期刊髮展方嚮提供決策依據.方法 參攷2009 - 2014年度《中國科技期刊引證報告》,採用文獻計量學方法對《學報》的總被引頻次、基金論文比、平均引文數、他引率、綜閤評價總分和影響因子進行統計分析.結果 2009 - 2014年,《學報》總被引頻次、平均引文數及綜閤評價總分均大幅上升,增幅分彆達117.60%、141.32%及61.24%,基金論文比、他引率及影響因子均呈現波動模式.結論 2009 - 2014年,《學報》整體呈現良好的可持續髮展勢頭,質量逐年提升,箇彆指標的波動也為本刊未來的髮展指明瞭方嚮.
목적 분석《해방군의학원학보》(이하간칭《학보》)2009 - 2014년도주요계량학지표,위기간발전방향제공결책의거.방법 삼고2009 - 2014년도《중국과기기간인증보고》,채용문헌계량학방법대《학보》적총피인빈차、기금논문비、평균인문수、타인솔、종합평개총분화영향인자진행통계분석.결과 2009 - 2014년,《학보》총피인빈차、평균인문수급종합평개총분균대폭상승,증폭분별체117.60%、141.32%급61.24%,기금논문비、타인솔급영향인자균정현파동모식.결론 2009 - 2014년,《학보》정체정현량호적가지속발전세두,질량축년제승,개별지표적파동야위본간미래적발전지명료방향.
Objective To provide evidence for the development inAcademicJournal of Chinese PLA Medical School by analyzing the major bibliometric indexes of papers published from 2009 to 2014.Methods The total cited frequency, foundation-supported papers, average number of citations, cited rate, and total overall assessment score of the papers published in this journal from 2009 to 2014 were comparatively analyzed according to Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports of 2009-2014 core editions, and the impact factor (IF) was comparatively analyzed according to the expand edition of the same period.Results The total cited frequency, average number of citations, and total overall assessment score of the papers published in the journal from 2009 to 2014 increased greatly with a growth rate of 117.60%, 141.32%, and 61.24%, respectively, while the foundation-supported papers, cited rate, and the IF showed ups and downs.Conclusion During these six years, the different bibliometric indexes of our journal show that we have achieved long-term sustainable development and virtuous growth, while the changes of some indexes tell us about the subject development orientation.