安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
2015年
11期
1696-1697,1698
,共3页
陈建武%张幸平%刘德鑫%肖丽华%吴敏%苏菁菁%郑建清
陳建武%張倖平%劉德鑫%肖麗華%吳敏%囌菁菁%鄭建清
진건무%장행평%류덕흠%초려화%오민%소정정%정건청
动脉灌注%放化疗%局部晚期鼻咽癌%近期疗效
動脈灌註%放化療%跼部晚期鼻嚥癌%近期療效
동맥관주%방화료%국부만기비인암%근기료효
intra-arterial chemotherapy%radio-chemotherapy%locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma%early clinical effect
将局部晚期鼻咽癌患者分为动脉灌注化疗联合放疗(IAC)组和静脉诱导化疗联合放疗(IVC)组。治疗后4周, IAC 组与 IVC 组的完全缓解(CR)率分别为94.0%、70.0%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);治疗后12周,IAC 组与 IVC组的 CR 率分别为98.0%、72.0%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组治疗有效率均为100%,均未发现远处转移病例。两组之间3、4级急性毒副反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。因此动脉灌注诱导化疗联合后期同步放化疗疗效可靠、安全。
將跼部晚期鼻嚥癌患者分為動脈灌註化療聯閤放療(IAC)組和靜脈誘導化療聯閤放療(IVC)組。治療後4週, IAC 組與 IVC 組的完全緩解(CR)率分彆為94.0%、70.0%,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05);治療後12週,IAC 組與 IVC組的 CR 率分彆為98.0%、72.0%,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。兩組治療有效率均為100%,均未髮現遠處轉移病例。兩組之間3、4級急性毒副反應髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。因此動脈灌註誘導化療聯閤後期同步放化療療效可靠、安全。
장국부만기비인암환자분위동맥관주화료연합방료(IAC)조화정맥유도화료연합방료(IVC)조。치료후4주, IAC 조여 IVC 조적완전완해(CR)솔분별위94.0%、70.0%,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05);치료후12주,IAC 조여 IVC조적 CR 솔분별위98.0%、72.0%,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。량조치료유효솔균위100%,균미발현원처전이병례。량조지간3、4급급성독부반응발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。인차동맥관주유도화료연합후기동보방화료료효가고、안전。
LANC was randomly divided into IAC,intra-arterial neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and IVC,intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy.After 4 weeks, the complete remission rate (CR)in group IAC and IVC was 94.0% vs 70.0%,with statistical significance (P <0.05),and at 12 weeks,98.0% vs 72.0%,with statistical significance (P <0.05).The effective rate of the two groups was both 100%,and there was no distant metastasis.3,4 grade of acute toxicity incidence in Group IAC and Group IVC was 32.0% and 34.0%,respectively,without statistical significance (P >0.05).Intra-arterial induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiotherapy has obvious effect on LANC and perform safely.