安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
2015年
11期
1649-1652
,共4页
谢言虎%周玲%章敏%柴小青
謝言虎%週玲%章敏%柴小青
사언호%주령%장민%시소청
超声%神经%隐神经%阻滞%手术
超聲%神經%隱神經%阻滯%手術
초성%신경%은신경%조체%수술
ultrasound%nerve%block%saphenous nerve%surgery
目的:观察超声联合神经刺激仪引导窝坐骨神经、股神经及追加隐神经阻滞后在膝关节以下手术的临床效果,探讨其临床应用的优缺点。方法择期行膝部以下手术患者60例,ASA 分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级,年龄20~75岁。采用随机数字表法将其分为两组(n =30):A 组超声联合神经刺激仪引导窝坐骨神经、股神经和隐神经阻滞,B 组则仅阻滞窝坐骨神经、股神经。记录阻滞前(T0)、阻滞后10 min(T1)、30 min(T2)、术毕(T3)的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR);记录神经阻滞完成时间、阻滞起效时间、术中舒芬太尼使用率及术后第1次使用镇痛药时间和患者满意度。结果两组患者年龄、性别、体重、ASA 分级及手术时间比较差异无统计学意义。A 组起效时间较 B 组明显缩短(P <0.05);B 组术中舒芬太尼使用率要明显高于 A 组;且 A 组患者术后第1次使用镇痛药时间较 B 组明显延长(P <0.05);A 组满意度比 B 组显著提高(P <0.05)。结论超声联合神经刺激仪引导窝坐骨神经、股神经阻滞应用于膝关节以下手术,定位准确,操作简单,血流动力学稳定且并发症少;若追加隐神经阻滞,则能缩短起效时间,镇痛更加完善,延长术后镇痛时间,患者满意度高,是一种更好的麻醉选择。
目的:觀察超聲聯閤神經刺激儀引導窩坐骨神經、股神經及追加隱神經阻滯後在膝關節以下手術的臨床效果,探討其臨床應用的優缺點。方法擇期行膝部以下手術患者60例,ASA 分級Ⅰ~Ⅲ級,年齡20~75歲。採用隨機數字錶法將其分為兩組(n =30):A 組超聲聯閤神經刺激儀引導窩坐骨神經、股神經和隱神經阻滯,B 組則僅阻滯窩坐骨神經、股神經。記錄阻滯前(T0)、阻滯後10 min(T1)、30 min(T2)、術畢(T3)的收縮壓(SBP)、舒張壓(DBP)、心率(HR);記錄神經阻滯完成時間、阻滯起效時間、術中舒芬太尼使用率及術後第1次使用鎮痛藥時間和患者滿意度。結果兩組患者年齡、性彆、體重、ASA 分級及手術時間比較差異無統計學意義。A 組起效時間較 B 組明顯縮短(P <0.05);B 組術中舒芬太尼使用率要明顯高于 A 組;且 A 組患者術後第1次使用鎮痛藥時間較 B 組明顯延長(P <0.05);A 組滿意度比 B 組顯著提高(P <0.05)。結論超聲聯閤神經刺激儀引導窩坐骨神經、股神經阻滯應用于膝關節以下手術,定位準確,操作簡單,血流動力學穩定且併髮癥少;若追加隱神經阻滯,則能縮短起效時間,鎮痛更加完善,延長術後鎮痛時間,患者滿意度高,是一種更好的痳醉選擇。
목적:관찰초성연합신경자격의인도와좌골신경、고신경급추가은신경조체후재슬관절이하수술적림상효과,탐토기림상응용적우결점。방법택기행슬부이하수술환자60례,ASA 분급Ⅰ~Ⅲ급,년령20~75세。채용수궤수자표법장기분위량조(n =30):A 조초성연합신경자격의인도와좌골신경、고신경화은신경조체,B 조칙부조체와좌골신경、고신경。기록조체전(T0)、조체후10 min(T1)、30 min(T2)、술필(T3)적수축압(SBP)、서장압(DBP)、심솔(HR);기록신경조체완성시간、조체기효시간、술중서분태니사용솔급술후제1차사용진통약시간화환자만의도。결과량조환자년령、성별、체중、ASA 분급급수술시간비교차이무통계학의의。A 조기효시간교 B 조명현축단(P <0.05);B 조술중서분태니사용솔요명현고우 A 조;차 A 조환자술후제1차사용진통약시간교 B 조명현연장(P <0.05);A 조만의도비 B 조현저제고(P <0.05)。결론초성연합신경자격의인도와좌골신경、고신경조체응용우슬관절이하수술,정위준학,조작간단,혈류동역학은정차병발증소;약추가은신경조체,칙능축단기효시간,진통경가완선,연장술후진통시간,환자만의도고,시일충경호적마취선택。
Objective To assess the advantages and disadvantages of popliteal fossa sciatic nerve,the femoral nerve and saphenous nerve block guided by ultrasound,compared the method without saphenous nerve block in pa-tients undergoing the surgery below knee.Methods Sixty patients (ASA Ⅰ ~Ⅲ)scheduled for the surgery below knee,age 20 ~75yr,were randomly divided into 2 groups (n =30 each)by random number table.Group A:Pop-liteal fossa sciatic nerve,the femoral nerve and saphenous nerve block guided by ultrasound,group B:Popliteal fossa sciatic nerve,the femoral nerve block guided by ultrasound.SBP,DBP,HR were recorded at before block (T0 ),10 min (T1 )and 30 min after blockade(T2 ),0 min after operation (T3 ).Time of nerve block,onset time of blockade,the rate of rescue sufentanil utilization intraoperative,the time for first rescue analgesic after operation and the rate of patient satisfaction were also recorded.Results Age,sex,weight,grade of ASA and surgery time in two groups were no statistically significant difference.Compared with group B,onset time(5.7 ±1.8min)and the rate of rescue sufentanil utilization intraoperative in group A were significantly decreased.And the time for first rescue analgesic(651.8 ±70.3min)was significantly prolonged in group A (P <0.05).Satisfaction in group A was significantly more than it in group B.The rate of required sufentanil in group A were significantly lower than that in group B (P <0.05).Conclusion The method of popliteal fossa sciatic nerve,the femoral nerve block guided by ultrasound in patients undergoing the surgery below knee has the advantages,including accurate loca-tion,simple procedure,stable hemodynamics and less complications.If saphenous nerve is also blocked,the meth-od would be a better choice for patients undergoing the surgery below knee because it could decrease the onset time,and improve quality of the blockade and satisfaction of patients.