国际检验医学杂志
國際檢驗醫學雜誌
국제검험의학잡지
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2015年
18期
2702-2703
,共2页
蔡长争%陈爱平%匡文斌%舒少为
蔡長爭%陳愛平%劻文斌%舒少為
채장쟁%진애평%광문빈%서소위
分析后质量控制%分析前质量控制%检验报告单
分析後質量控製%分析前質量控製%檢驗報告單
분석후질량공제%분석전질량공제%검험보고단
after analysis quality control%pre-analysis quality control%laboratory report
目的:探讨检验分析后质量控制在检验工作中的重要性。方法收集2012年1月至2014年6月临床医生反馈到检验科的450份不合格检验报告单,分析不合格检验报告单产生的原因。结果450份不合格检验报告单中,测定结果与临床诊断不符169份,占37.6%;漏检、错检项目149份,占33.1%;无送检者或未注明送检科室62份,占13.8%;达到危急值未复查或已复查未注明36份,占8.0%;标本有脂浊、黄疸等未注明18份,占4.0%;标本类别错误16份,占3.6%。结论报告单发出前需认真执行检验分析后质量控制制度,规范操作规程,认真核对每一份检验报告单,明确责任,提高责任意识,为临床提供一份合格的检验报告单。
目的:探討檢驗分析後質量控製在檢驗工作中的重要性。方法收集2012年1月至2014年6月臨床醫生反饋到檢驗科的450份不閤格檢驗報告單,分析不閤格檢驗報告單產生的原因。結果450份不閤格檢驗報告單中,測定結果與臨床診斷不符169份,佔37.6%;漏檢、錯檢項目149份,佔33.1%;無送檢者或未註明送檢科室62份,佔13.8%;達到危急值未複查或已複查未註明36份,佔8.0%;標本有脂濁、黃疸等未註明18份,佔4.0%;標本類彆錯誤16份,佔3.6%。結論報告單髮齣前需認真執行檢驗分析後質量控製製度,規範操作規程,認真覈對每一份檢驗報告單,明確責任,提高責任意識,為臨床提供一份閤格的檢驗報告單。
목적:탐토검험분석후질량공제재검험공작중적중요성。방법수집2012년1월지2014년6월림상의생반궤도검험과적450빈불합격검험보고단,분석불합격검험보고단산생적원인。결과450빈불합격검험보고단중,측정결과여림상진단불부169빈,점37.6%;루검、착검항목149빈,점33.1%;무송검자혹미주명송검과실62빈,점13.8%;체도위급치미복사혹이복사미주명36빈,점8.0%;표본유지탁、황달등미주명18빈,점4.0%;표본유별착오16빈,점3.6%。결론보고단발출전수인진집행검험분석후질량공제제도,규범조작규정,인진핵대매일빈검험보고단,명학책임,제고책임의식,위림상제공일빈합격적검험보고단。
Objective To explore the significance of quality control after clinical laboratory analysis .Methods A total of 450 pieces of unqualified testing reports were collected from the Department of Clinical Laboratory from January 2012 to June 2014 and reasons causing unqualified testing reports were analyzed .Results In all 450 pieces of unqualified testing reports ,testing results of 169 pieces were inconsistent with results of clinical diagnosis ,accounted for 37 .6% ;149 pieces with missing or indirect inspection i‐tems ,accounted for 33 .1% ;62 pieces did not indicate staff or department sending specimens ,accounted for 13 .8% ;results of 36 pieces reached the critical value but without re‐inspection or did not indicate the re‐inspection ,accounted for 8 .0% ;18 pieces did not clarify specimens with lipid turbidity or jaundice and so on ,accounted for 4 .0% ;16 pieces marked with wrong sample types ,accoun‐ted for 3 .6% .Conclusion It is necessary to conduct quality control after clinical laboratory analysis before delivering report ,stand‐ardize operating procedures ,check every report seriously ,make clear responsibility and improve awareness of responsibility ,in order to provide a qualified testing report for clinical practice .