实用口腔医学杂志
實用口腔醫學雜誌
실용구강의학잡지
Journal of Practical Stomatology
2015年
5期
627-632
,共6页
张珑%李芳萍%杨柏松%郭妍%逯宜
張瓏%李芳萍%楊柏鬆%郭妍%逯宜
장롱%리방평%양백송%곽연%록의
下颌第一磨牙%邻牙合(II 类)洞型%嵌体%应力分析
下頜第一磨牙%鄰牙閤(II 類)洞型%嵌體%應力分析
하합제일마아%린아합(II 류)동형%감체%응력분석
Mandibular first molar%Meiso-occlusal(class II)cavity%Inlay%Stress analysis
目的:分析不同材料嵌体修复邻(牙合)(II 类)洞型后牙体、嵌体的应力改变及分布。方法:建立不同材料嵌体修复邻(牙合)(II 类)近中-(牙合)(MO)洞型三维有限元模型,求解分析各模型中垂直、侧向力(舌向45°)加载条件下牙体、嵌体主应力峰值及接触界面 Von-mises 峰值,并分析应力分布情况。结果:高弹性模量嵌体材料及其修复后的牙体应力峰值比低弹性模量嵌体材料高,2种加载下4种材料对牙体、嵌体应力分布趋势相似;侧向加载明显高于垂直加载。牙体应力峰值在洞底部牙本质近牙髓腔的位置;嵌体的应力峰值分布主要在其所对应的龈壁处。在牙体,其与嵌体的接触缘处的应力趋势表现为树脂>瓷>金合金>钴铬合金;在嵌体,其与牙体的接触处应力趋势为钴铬>金合金>瓷>树脂。结论:邻(牙合)(II 类)洞型嵌体修复后与龈壁对应处是嵌体的薄弱部位,洞底部近髓腔处是牙体的薄弱部位;与其它3种材料相比,树脂嵌体在同等载荷下牙体应力峰值小且分布均匀,自身受力较小,因此发生牙体折裂及微渗漏的可能性较小。
目的:分析不同材料嵌體脩複鄰(牙閤)(II 類)洞型後牙體、嵌體的應力改變及分佈。方法:建立不同材料嵌體脩複鄰(牙閤)(II 類)近中-(牙閤)(MO)洞型三維有限元模型,求解分析各模型中垂直、側嚮力(舌嚮45°)加載條件下牙體、嵌體主應力峰值及接觸界麵 Von-mises 峰值,併分析應力分佈情況。結果:高彈性模量嵌體材料及其脩複後的牙體應力峰值比低彈性模量嵌體材料高,2種加載下4種材料對牙體、嵌體應力分佈趨勢相似;側嚮加載明顯高于垂直加載。牙體應力峰值在洞底部牙本質近牙髓腔的位置;嵌體的應力峰值分佈主要在其所對應的齦壁處。在牙體,其與嵌體的接觸緣處的應力趨勢錶現為樹脂>瓷>金閤金>鈷鉻閤金;在嵌體,其與牙體的接觸處應力趨勢為鈷鉻>金閤金>瓷>樹脂。結論:鄰(牙閤)(II 類)洞型嵌體脩複後與齦壁對應處是嵌體的薄弱部位,洞底部近髓腔處是牙體的薄弱部位;與其它3種材料相比,樹脂嵌體在同等載荷下牙體應力峰值小且分佈均勻,自身受力較小,因此髮生牙體摺裂及微滲漏的可能性較小。
목적:분석불동재료감체수복린(아합)(II 류)동형후아체、감체적응력개변급분포。방법:건립불동재료감체수복린(아합)(II 류)근중-(아합)(MO)동형삼유유한원모형,구해분석각모형중수직、측향력(설향45°)가재조건하아체、감체주응력봉치급접촉계면 Von-mises 봉치,병분석응력분포정황。결과:고탄성모량감체재료급기수복후적아체응력봉치비저탄성모량감체재료고,2충가재하4충재료대아체、감체응력분포추세상사;측향가재명현고우수직가재。아체응력봉치재동저부아본질근아수강적위치;감체적응력봉치분포주요재기소대응적간벽처。재아체,기여감체적접촉연처적응력추세표현위수지>자>금합금>고락합금;재감체,기여아체적접촉처응력추세위고락>금합금>자>수지。결론:린(아합)(II 류)동형감체수복후여간벽대응처시감체적박약부위,동저부근수강처시아체적박약부위;여기타3충재료상비,수지감체재동등재하하아체응력봉치소차분포균균,자신수력교소,인차발생아체절렬급미삼루적가능성교소。
Objective:To analyse the stress distribution of the tooth and inlay with the restoration of resin,porcelain,gold alloy,co-balt chromium materials respectively.Methods:3-D finite element models of mandibular first molar with meiso-occlusal (class II) cavity and different inlays were established.Von-mises stress distribution on the tooth and inlay with vertical load and lingual load at 45°were analyzed.Results:After restoration peak stress of high elastic module materials and dental inlays was higher than that of the low elastic module material inlays,however,the restorations of the different elastic module materials had the similar stress distribution trend.The stress under of lateral load(lingual at 45°)to the teeth inlays was significantly higher than that under vertical load.Peak stress concentration of tooth was on the bottom of the cavity near the pulp chamber dentin;inlay peak stress distribution is mainly in its corresponding to the gingival wall.In the tooth tissues stress level of the contact surface of inlay restoration,the strength was as the fol-lowing:Composite resin inlay >ceramics inlay >the gold alloy ceramics inlay >cobalt chromium alloy inlay.The stress level of the inlay of the four kinds of inlay restoration materials was just opponent with the tooth tissues.Conclusion:Gingival wall is the weakest part of meiso-occlusal(class II)cavity inlay restoration,while near the pulp chamber at the bottom of the cavity is the weakest part of the tooth.Among the 4 materials Under the same load condition,composite resin inlay restoration has minimal tooth stress and uniform stress distribution,and can reduce the posibility of odontoschism and microleakage.