实用口腔医学杂志
實用口腔醫學雜誌
실용구강의학잡지
Journal of Practical Stomatology
2015年
5期
700-703
,共4页
梁剑梅%陈文霞%李康婧%钟钰
樑劍梅%陳文霞%李康婧%鐘鈺
량검매%진문하%리강청%종옥
Resilon /Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)%根管充填%X线阻射
Resilon /Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)%根管充填%X線阻射
Resilon /Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)%근관충전%X선조사
Resilon /Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)%Root canal filling%X-ray resistance
目的:评价 Resilon/Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)在根管治疗术中的充填质量。方法:收集30颗因牙周病或正畸治疗需要拔除的离体下颌前磨牙,随机分为2组,牙胶/AH plus 组16颗牙,RESE 组14颗牙。经常规开髓拔髓、根管预备后,实验组以 RESE 充填根管,对照组以牙胶/AH plus 充填根管。根管充填完毕摄 X 线牙片计分评价2种材料根管充填的影像质量。结果:2种充填材料颊舌向 X 线评价均高于近中远中向(P <0.05),颊舌向 X 线观察2种充填材料没有差异(P >0.05);近远中向 X 线观察 RESE 组根充的影像质量好于牙胶/AH plus 组(P <0.05)。结论:RESE 充填系统具有良好的 X 线阻射性,有利于通过 X 线片观察其根管充填效果。
目的:評價 Resilon/Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)在根管治療術中的充填質量。方法:收集30顆因牙週病或正畸治療需要拔除的離體下頜前磨牙,隨機分為2組,牙膠/AH plus 組16顆牙,RESE 組14顆牙。經常規開髓拔髓、根管預備後,實驗組以 RESE 充填根管,對照組以牙膠/AH plus 充填根管。根管充填完畢攝 X 線牙片計分評價2種材料根管充填的影像質量。結果:2種充填材料頰舌嚮 X 線評價均高于近中遠中嚮(P <0.05),頰舌嚮 X 線觀察2種充填材料沒有差異(P >0.05);近遠中嚮 X 線觀察 RESE 組根充的影像質量好于牙膠/AH plus 組(P <0.05)。結論:RESE 充填繫統具有良好的 X 線阻射性,有利于通過 X 線片觀察其根管充填效果。
목적:평개 Resilon/Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE)재근관치료술중적충전질량。방법:수집30과인아주병혹정기치료수요발제적리체하합전마아,수궤분위2조,아효/AH plus 조16과아,RESE 조14과아。경상규개수발수、근관예비후,실험조이 RESE 충전근관,대조조이아효/AH plus 충전근관。근관충전완필섭 X 선아편계분평개2충재료근관충전적영상질량。결과:2충충전재료협설향 X 선평개균고우근중원중향(P <0.05),협설향 X 선관찰2충충전재료몰유차이(P >0.05);근원중향 X 선관찰 RESE 조근충적영상질량호우아효/AH plus 조(P <0.05)。결론:RESE 충전계통구유량호적 X 선조사성,유리우통과 X 선편관찰기근관충전효과。
Objective:To evaluate the quality of root filling with Resilon/Epiphany Self-Etch(RESE).Methods:30 recently extrac-ted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 2 groups.After root canal preparation,the roots in experimental group(n =1 4) were filled with RESE,those in control group(n =1 6)were filled with Gutta-percha/AH plus.The quality of the optical obturation was evaluated by X-ray photography.Results:The buccolingual X-ray scores of the two filling materials were higher than the mesiodistal sores(P <0.05),there was no statistical significance between the two kinds of filling materials(P >0.05).The mesiodistal X-ray score of RESE group was higher than that of Gutta-percha/AH plus group(P <0.05).Conclusion:The X-ray resistance of the RESE filling system is more favorable than Gutta-percha/AH plus for the evaluation of root filling quality by X-ray examination.