CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探究循证护理应用于急性心肌梗死后心律失常护理中的效果。方法选取2014年3月～2015年2月我院收治的急性心肌梗死后心律失常的85例患者将其按照不同的护理模式分为常规组（n=40）和研究组（n=45），常规组应用常规的护理干预模式，研究组应用循证护理模式，比较两组患者的护理效果。结果常规组心律失常的发生率为15%（6/40）高于研究组心律失常发生率2%（1/45），护理满意度70%低于研究组护理满意度91%，差异有统计学意义，P＜0.05。结论急性心肌梗死后心律失常应用循证护理能降低心律失常的发生率，提高护理满意度。
목적：탐구순증호리응용우급성심기경사후심률실상호리중적효과。방법선취2014년3월～2015년2월아원수치적급성심기경사후심률실상적85례환자장기안조불동적호리모식분위상규조（n=40）화연구조（n=45），상규조응용상규적호리간예모식，연구조응용순증호리모식，비교량조환자적호리효과。결과상규조심률실상적발생솔위15%（6/40）고우연구조심률실상발생솔2%（1/45），호리만의도70%저우연구조호리만의도91%，차이유통계학의의，P＜0.05。결론급성심기경사후심률실상응용순증호리능강저심률실상적발생솔，제고호리만의도。
Objective To explore the application of evidence-based nursing in nursing effect of the arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction. Methods March 2014 to February 2015, our hospital during the period of the arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction of the 85 patients in different nursing model divided into normal group (n=40) and group (n=45), conventional group of routine nursing intervention mode, the team application of evidence-based nursing mode, compare the nursing effect of two groups of patients. Results Normal group, the incidence of arrhythmia was 15% (6/40) than evidence-based incidence of arrhythmia was 2%(1/45), 70%lower than that of evidence-based nursing satisfaction nursing satisfaction was 91%, the difference was statistically signiifcant, P<0.05. Conclusion The arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction in application of evidence-based nursing can reduce the incidence of arrhythmia, improve nursing satisfaction.