CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察刃针治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法：将60例膝骨关节炎患者采用随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组，每组30例。对照组采用西药常规治疗，治疗组在对照组治疗基础上加用刃针治疗。两组疗程均为15 d。观察两组治疗前后膝关节疼痛VAS评分及膝关节功能KSS评分。结果：治疗后，两组VAS评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；两组KSS评分比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：刃针可以很好地缓解膝骨关节炎患者屈伸不利、活动受限的症状，但对膝关节疼痛的缓解效果不明显。
목적：관찰인침치료슬골관절염적림상료효。방법：장60례슬골관절염환자채용수궤수자표법분위치료조화대조조，매조30례。대조조채용서약상규치료，치료조재대조조치료기출상가용인침치료。량조료정균위15 d。관찰량조치료전후슬관절동통VAS평분급슬관절공능KSS평분。결과：치료후，량조VAS평분비교，차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；량조KSS평분비교，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：인침가이흔호지완해슬골관절염환자굴신불리、활동수한적증상，단대슬관절동통적완해효과불명현。
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of treating knee osteoarthritis with blade acupuncture.Methods:60 cases of knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,30 cases in each.The control group was routinely treated with Western medicine,while the treatment group was treated with the blade needle based on the treatment of the former.The course of treatment for the two groups was 15 days.The knee pain VAS score and the KSS knee function score of the two groups were observed before and after treatment.Results:After treatment,the difference between VAS scores of the two groups was not statistically signiifcant(P> 0.05);while the difference of KSS scores of the two groups was statistically signiifcant(P< 0.05).Conclusion:Blade knife can relieve inlfexibility and limited activity of patients’ knees,but not obviously for the their pain.