中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志
中國急救複囌與災害醫學雜誌
중국급구복소여재해의학잡지
China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
2015年
8期
732-734
,共3页
巨大儿%危险因素%孕妇体重
巨大兒%危險因素%孕婦體重
거대인%위험인소%잉부체중
Macrosomia%Risk factor%Body weight of pregnant woman
目的:探讨巨大儿发病的危险因素。方法2267名住院分娩的孕妇中,136名(5.99%)产下巨大儿(M组),又从全部产妇中随机选出136例未产下巨大儿者作为对照(NM组)。对比分析两组的孕产指标,判定巨大儿发病的危险因素。结果两组的年龄、身高、妊娠期糖尿病发病率等差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。M组的经产妇比例、孕前体重指数、孕期体重增长、剖宫产率、产后出血率等均显著高于NM组(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析表明:经产妇(OR=8.82,95%CI:4.09~19.03),孕前体重指数(OR=1.27,95%CI:1.11~1.45)、孕期体重增长(OR=1.26,95%CI:1.14~1.38)为巨大儿的危险因素。结论经产妇、孕前体重指数、和孕期体重增长为巨大儿的危险因素。围产期体重管理非常重要。
目的:探討巨大兒髮病的危險因素。方法2267名住院分娩的孕婦中,136名(5.99%)產下巨大兒(M組),又從全部產婦中隨機選齣136例未產下巨大兒者作為對照(NM組)。對比分析兩組的孕產指標,判定巨大兒髮病的危險因素。結果兩組的年齡、身高、妊娠期糖尿病髮病率等差異無統計學意義(均P>0.05)。M組的經產婦比例、孕前體重指數、孕期體重增長、剖宮產率、產後齣血率等均顯著高于NM組(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic迴歸分析錶明:經產婦(OR=8.82,95%CI:4.09~19.03),孕前體重指數(OR=1.27,95%CI:1.11~1.45)、孕期體重增長(OR=1.26,95%CI:1.14~1.38)為巨大兒的危險因素。結論經產婦、孕前體重指數、和孕期體重增長為巨大兒的危險因素。圍產期體重管理非常重要。
목적:탐토거대인발병적위험인소。방법2267명주원분면적잉부중,136명(5.99%)산하거대인(M조),우종전부산부중수궤선출136례미산하거대인자작위대조(NM조)。대비분석량조적잉산지표,판정거대인발병적위험인소。결과량조적년령、신고、임신기당뇨병발병솔등차이무통계학의의(균P>0.05)。M조적경산부비례、잉전체중지수、잉기체중증장、부궁산솔、산후출혈솔등균현저고우NM조(균P<0.05)。다인소Logistic회귀분석표명:경산부(OR=8.82,95%CI:4.09~19.03),잉전체중지수(OR=1.27,95%CI:1.11~1.45)、잉기체중증장(OR=1.26,95%CI:1.14~1.38)위거대인적위험인소。결론경산부、잉전체중지수、화잉기체중증장위거대인적위험인소。위산기체중관리비상중요。
Objective To explore the risk factors of macrosomia. Methods 2267 pregnant women underwent hospital delivary out of which 136 (5.99%) gave birth to macrosomia (Group M) and from which another 136 maternal women were selected randomly as non-macrosomia group (Group NM). The obstetric indicis of these 2 groups were comparatively analyzed so as to determine the risk factors for macrosomia. Results There were no significant differences in age, body height, and incidence of gestational diabetes between these 2 groups (all P>0.05). The proportion of multiparae, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), weight gain during pregnancy, Cesarean section rate, and postpartum hemorrhage rate of Group M were all significantly higher than those of Group NM (all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that being multipara (OR=8.82, 95%CI:4.09~19.03), pre-pregnancy BMI(OR=1.27, 95%CI:1.11~1.45 ), and weight gain during pregnancy (OR=1.26, 95%CI:1.14~1.38) were the risk factors for macrosomia. Conclusion Being multipara (OR=8.82, 95%CI:4.09~19.03), pre-pregnancy BMI(OR=1.27, 95% CI: 1.11~1.45 ), and weight gain during pregnancy (OR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.14~1.38) are the risk factors for macrosomia. Perinatal body weight management is very important.