中国病案
中國病案
중국병안
Chinese Medical Record
2015年
9期
58-59,2
,共3页
贾红光%张晓松%段冉%陈晓艳%柴囡
賈紅光%張曉鬆%段冉%陳曉豔%柴囡
가홍광%장효송%단염%진효염%시닙
电话随访%支气管哮喘%健康教育%影响
電話隨訪%支氣管哮喘%健康教育%影響
전화수방%지기관효천%건강교육%영향
Telephone follow-up%Bronchial asthma%Health education%Influence
目的:探讨电话随访对支气管哮喘患者的影响。方法抽取2012年6月至2013年6月出院的180例支气管哮喘患者,随机分为对照组和干预组,对照组给予常规出院指导,干预组在此基础上定期进行电话随访。半年后利用患者来院复诊的机会对其进行问卷调查,评价两组患者支气管哮喘知识知晓率、治疗依从率及再入院率。结果干预组患者疾病知识知晓率(81.8%)高于对照组(50.6%);治疗依从率(77.9%)高于对照组(47.7%);再入院率(10.9%)低于对照组(37.2%),两组患者知晓率、依从率及再入院率比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论对支气管哮喘患者实施电话随访干预,可提高患者疾病知识知晓率和治疗依从性,减少其再入院率,有效促进患者健康。
目的:探討電話隨訪對支氣管哮喘患者的影響。方法抽取2012年6月至2013年6月齣院的180例支氣管哮喘患者,隨機分為對照組和榦預組,對照組給予常規齣院指導,榦預組在此基礎上定期進行電話隨訪。半年後利用患者來院複診的機會對其進行問捲調查,評價兩組患者支氣管哮喘知識知曉率、治療依從率及再入院率。結果榦預組患者疾病知識知曉率(81.8%)高于對照組(50.6%);治療依從率(77.9%)高于對照組(47.7%);再入院率(10.9%)低于對照組(37.2%),兩組患者知曉率、依從率及再入院率比較,差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.01)。結論對支氣管哮喘患者實施電話隨訪榦預,可提高患者疾病知識知曉率和治療依從性,減少其再入院率,有效促進患者健康。
목적:탐토전화수방대지기관효천환자적영향。방법추취2012년6월지2013년6월출원적180례지기관효천환자,수궤분위대조조화간예조,대조조급여상규출원지도,간예조재차기출상정기진행전화수방。반년후이용환자래원복진적궤회대기진행문권조사,평개량조환자지기관효천지식지효솔、치료의종솔급재입원솔。결과간예조환자질병지식지효솔(81.8%)고우대조조(50.6%);치료의종솔(77.9%)고우대조조(47.7%);재입원솔(10.9%)저우대조조(37.2%),량조환자지효솔、의종솔급재입원솔비교,차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.01)。결론대지기관효천환자실시전화수방간예,가제고환자질병지식지효솔화치료의종성,감소기재입원솔,유효촉진환자건강。
Objective To investigate the impact of telephone follow-up intervention on the patients with bronchial asthma. Methods 180 bronchial asthma patients who discharged from June 2013 to June 2014 were randomized into control and intervenient groups. The control group received routine discharge guidance while intervenient group were given additional telephone follow-up intervention. Six months later, when the patients come to hospital for further consultation, a questionnaire was applied and the rates of treatment compliance, the levels of knowledge mastering and reoccurrence were compared between the two groups. Results The Aware rate of knowledge about disease intervention group patients (81.8%) was higher than the control group (50.6%), treatment compliance rate (77.9%) was higher than the control group (47.7%) and the readmission rate (10.9%) was lower than the control group (37.2%). The differences between the two groups were of statistical significance (P<0.01). Conclusions Telephone follow-up intervention could raise the rates of treatment compliance and the levels of knowledge mastering, which could effectively promote patient health and decrease the reoccurrence evidently.