CAJ | 학술논문

文章运用对比教学原理，通过类比的方法，对中国的武术散打与韩国的跆拳道做三项比较研究，即发展现状与推广、技术风格特征和比赛规则。比较结果表明：跆拳道无论是从改革时间、推广途径、对外传播、练习人数、国际比赛最高组织形式都明显高于散打；现代武术散打的攻防特征倾向于防守后的反击，其观赏性明显不如跆拳道的对踢技术风格；跆拳道规则统一，评判标准相对简单，而相比之下，散打的规则随意性较大。建议：我国要从文化的高度来审视武术散打，加快向外推广的步伐，提倡散打终身教育模式。
문장운용대비교학원리，통과류비적방법，대중국적무술산타여한국적태권도주삼항비교연구，즉발전현상여추엄、기술풍격특정화비새규칙。비교결과표명：태권도무론시종개혁시간、추엄도경、대외전파、연습인수、국제비새최고조직형식도명현고우산타；현대무술산타적공방특정경향우방수후적반격，기관상성명현불여태권도적대척기술풍격；태권도규칙통일，평판표준상대간단，이상비지하，산타적규칙수의성교대。건의：아국요종문화적고도래심시무술산타，가쾌향외추엄적보벌，제창산타종신교육모식。
By exploiting comparative teaching principle and adopting the method of analogy, this paper conducted a comparative study from three aspects of Chinese Sanda and Korean taekwondo, namely development and promotion, technical characteristics and rules of the game. This study shows that: whether it is from the time of the reformation, ways of promotion, transmission, numbers of practitioners, or international competition, taekwondo is more higher than that of the modern Sanda; the offensive and defensive characteristics of modern Sanda tend to be counterattack after defense, which is less ornamental than Taekwondo; and that Taekwondo has a uniform rules and criteria, in contrast Sanda’s rules are relatively random. Suggestions: China should examine Sanda from the cultural perspective and accelerate the pace of promotion and to promote lifelong education mode of Sanda.