农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
2015年
18期
225-232
,共8页
土地利用%分区%划定%耕地质量与立地条件%高标准基本农田
土地利用%分區%劃定%耕地質量與立地條件%高標準基本農田
토지이용%분구%화정%경지질량여입지조건%고표준기본농전
land use%zoning%planning%farmland quality and site conditions%high-standard prime farmland
保障高标准基本农田建设的永久稳定是在土地整治战略背景下持续提升粮食产能的重要举措。该文以沈阳市沈北新区为例,以美国重要农地保护的LESA(land evaluation and site assessment)体系思想为指导,构建耕地质量与立地条件综合分析体系,采取多因素综合对比分析法,开展高标准基本农田建设的适宜性评价和非适宜性评价,该研究区划定高标准基本农田优先建设区的面积为11212.42 hm2,该建设区基本农田质量较优,经济社会发展压力较小;划定有条件建设区的面积为18714.36 hm2,该建设区有良好的基本农田质量条件,但需要对高标准基本农田建设的影响因素和限制条件采取一定的整治技术和措施;划定限制建设区的面积为7491.30 hm2,该建设区耕地质量及立地条件差异显著,城区周边受立地环境条件影响较大,远离城区基本农田质量条件较差。
保障高標準基本農田建設的永久穩定是在土地整治戰略揹景下持續提升糧食產能的重要舉措。該文以瀋暘市瀋北新區為例,以美國重要農地保護的LESA(land evaluation and site assessment)體繫思想為指導,構建耕地質量與立地條件綜閤分析體繫,採取多因素綜閤對比分析法,開展高標準基本農田建設的適宜性評價和非適宜性評價,該研究區劃定高標準基本農田優先建設區的麵積為11212.42 hm2,該建設區基本農田質量較優,經濟社會髮展壓力較小;劃定有條件建設區的麵積為18714.36 hm2,該建設區有良好的基本農田質量條件,但需要對高標準基本農田建設的影響因素和限製條件採取一定的整治技術和措施;劃定限製建設區的麵積為7491.30 hm2,該建設區耕地質量及立地條件差異顯著,城區週邊受立地環境條件影響較大,遠離城區基本農田質量條件較差。
보장고표준기본농전건설적영구은정시재토지정치전략배경하지속제승양식산능적중요거조。해문이침양시침북신구위례,이미국중요농지보호적LESA(land evaluation and site assessment)체계사상위지도,구건경지질량여입지조건종합분석체계,채취다인소종합대비분석법,개전고표준기본농전건설적괄의성평개화비괄의성평개,해연구구화정고표준기본농전우선건설구적면적위11212.42 hm2,해건설구기본농전질량교우,경제사회발전압력교소;화정유조건건설구적면적위18714.36 hm2,해건설구유량호적기본농전질량조건,단수요대고표준기본농전건설적영향인소화한제조건채취일정적정치기술화조시;화정한제건설구적면적위7491.30 hm2,해건설구경지질량급입지조건차이현저,성구주변수입지배경조건영향교대,원리성구기본농전질량조건교차。
The high-standard prime farmland construction is an important measure to promote food production capacity on the background of land reclamation. Taking the new district of the north of Shenyang as study area, this paper constructed the synthesis system of farmland quality evaluation and site environment assessment under the guidance of LESA (Land Evaluation and Site Assessment) system idea for important farmland protection in America. The LESA system is composed of the LE system and SA system, which reflects the farmland quality by the result of LE evaluation and the suitability for social economy by the result of SA evaluation, and the site conditions include good and bad impact conditions. The land evaluation indices include natural indices such as slope, soil characteristics, and the site evaluation indices include social and economic indices such as urbanization, management efficiency and GDP (gross domestic product). In the evaluation process, suitability and unsuitability evaluation were separately carried out for high-standard prime farmland construction using the method of comprehensive contrastive analysis of several factors. Five suitable and unsuitable grades were classified by the natural breakpoint method with GIS (geographic information system) software. For the first 2 levels of suitability zone, the obvious characteristic was that the natural quality of farmland was superior to another 3 levels, which had better soil fertility including thicker soil layer, higher soil organic matter, better irrigation and drainage system. The LE result showed that these zones of good quality farmland were the most suitable for high-standard prime farmland construction, but when we considered the site conditions, some zones in the district were maybe not suitable, because some site conditions had negative impacts on the stability of high-standard prime farmland, which indicated that the evaluation of the site condition assessment was also needed. The unsuitability evaluation results showed that the farmland in the first 2levels of unsuitable zone had the highest risk of being occupied, and the site conditions included the pressure of urbanization, GDP and other social developing factors. Finally, 3 kinds of zones were planned including preferential construction area, conditional construction area and limited construction area. The results showed that there was 11 212.42 hm2 for preferential construction area, where the prime farmland had better quality and less pressure from social economy, and was distributed in the first and second grade of quality evaluation and the fourth grade of site environment assessment; there was 18 714.36 hm2 for conditional construction area, where the prime farmland had good quality and been influenced by site conditions, which was distributed in the second, third and fourth grade of quality evaluation and also the second, third and fourth grade of site environment assessment; there was 7 491.30 hm2 for limited construction area, where the prime farmland had different qualities and site conditions, which were that the prime farmland in the town surrounding was more influenced by site environment and had the risk for protection and using, while that far from the town surrounding had difficult conditions for using and improvement. The LESA system had a lot of advantages, which considered not only the good quality of farmland, but also the risk occupied by economic development demand, and the evaluation index was selected flexibly and could be adjusted according to different conditions, so the LESA system could be used in planning basic farmland, land planning, land reclamation and requisition-compensation of arable land and so on. In each place, when we used the LESA system, the selected evaluation indices must be suitable for the actual conditions, and we could refer to different advisories of different people or departments including agricultural experts, economic experts and other social managers. In this paper, it was also pointed out that the high-standard prime farmland construction should mainly consider the demand of large farming household, agricultural cooperative and family farm, combined with agriculture scale and industrialization business.