深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）
深圳大學學報（人文社會科學版）
심수대학학보（인문사회과학판）
Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
2015年
5期
26-31
,共6页
湖湘学派%仁学%朱子%批判
湖湘學派%仁學%硃子%批判
호상학파%인학%주자%비판
Huxiang School%the theory of benevolence%ZHU Xi%criticism
仁学是北宋道学重构时的核心论域。湖湘学派接续和推进程颢、谢良佐一系的仁学思想，他们不从“气质之性”立论，主张“以心释仁”、“以觉训仁”以及“为仁先识仁体”，凸显“心”的地位，推动汉唐以来人性论向心性论的转变。朱子为重塑道统，建构仁学，以“下学而上达”与“心非仁”为标准，对湖湘学派的仁学展开系统的批判，认为湖湘学派的仁学忽视“气质之性”，整体导向高远玄虚。朱子的批判加速湖湘学派的衰落，至陆王心学崛起，程颢、湖湘一系的仁学得以重光，成为仁学史上较有特色的理论体系。
仁學是北宋道學重構時的覈心論域。湖湘學派接續和推進程顥、謝良佐一繫的仁學思想，他們不從“氣質之性”立論，主張“以心釋仁”、“以覺訓仁”以及“為仁先識仁體”，凸顯“心”的地位，推動漢唐以來人性論嚮心性論的轉變。硃子為重塑道統，建構仁學，以“下學而上達”與“心非仁”為標準，對湖湘學派的仁學展開繫統的批判，認為湖湘學派的仁學忽視“氣質之性”，整體導嚮高遠玄虛。硃子的批判加速湖湘學派的衰落，至陸王心學崛起，程顥、湖湘一繫的仁學得以重光，成為仁學史上較有特色的理論體繫。
인학시북송도학중구시적핵심론역。호상학파접속화추진정호、사량좌일계적인학사상，타문불종“기질지성”립론，주장“이심석인”、“이각훈인”이급“위인선식인체”，철현“심”적지위，추동한당이래인성론향심성론적전변。주자위중소도통，건구인학，이“하학이상체”여“심비인”위표준，대호상학파적인학전개계통적비판，인위호상학파적인학홀시“기질지성”，정체도향고원현허。주자적비판가속호상학파적쇠락，지륙왕심학굴기，정호、호상일계적인학득이중광，성위인학사상교유특색적이론체계。
The theory of benevolence is the core category in the reconstruction of Confucianism in Northern Song Dynasty. Huxiang school continued and advanced CHENG Hao and XIE Liang-zuo's theory of benevolence. They didn't base their arguments on “physical nature”, but advocated “using mind to explain benevolence”,“using awareness to explain benevolence”, and “practicing benevolence after knowing the concept of ‘benevo-lence as substance'”, which made the status of “mind” outstanding and promoted the transition from “ theory of human nature”to“theory of mind”since Han and Tang dynasties. In order to rebuild orthodox Confucianism and construct the theory of benevolence, ZHU Xi criticized the benevolence theory of Huxiang School for they ignored“physical nature” and their overall orientation was lofty and delusional. ZHU Xi's criticism accelerated the decline of Huxiang School. Not until the rise of the mind-philosophy of LU Jiu-yuan and WANG Yang-ming did the theory of Chen Hao and Huxiang School revive and became distinctive.
