CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨不同身份识别方法对住院精神病患者临床护理管理质量的影响。方法通过常规识别、腕带识别、指纹识别仪识别,比较使用不同标识前后对精神病患者身份识别的正确率、依从率、缺陷率、腕带材料成本节约率、精神病患者对身份识别的满意率的影响。结果不同标识患者身份识别的正确率分别为95.60%,99.00%,100%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=62.58,P<0.05),3组间两两比较差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为25.42,44.99,10.06；P<0.01)。使用指纹识别仪前后精神病患者对身份识别依从率分别是82%,98%；身份识别的缺陷率分别是36%,6%；腕带材料成本节约率分别是5%,45%；精神病患者对身份识别方式的满意率分别是86%,99%；差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为45.81,282.74,490.08,10.07；P<0.01)。结论不同标识患者身份识别正确率不同。腕带有利于提高精神病患者身份识别的正确率,而指纹识别仪正确率最高,它避免腕带在精神科使用的局限性,提高精神科护患双方身份识别的依从性,降低身份识别的缺陷率,节约人力及材料成本及提高护患双方的满意率。
목적：탐토불동신빈식별방법대주원정신병환자림상호리관리질량적영향。방법통과상규식별、완대식별、지문식별의식별,비교사용불동표식전후대정신병환자신빈식별적정학솔、의종솔、결함솔、완대재료성본절약솔、정신병환자대신빈식별적만의솔적영향。결과불동표식환자신빈식별적정학솔분별위95.60%,99.00%,100%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=62.58,P<0.05),3조간량량비교차이균유통계학의의(χ2치분별위25.42,44.99,10.06；P<0.01)。사용지문식별의전후정신병환자대신빈식별의종솔분별시82%,98%；신빈식별적결함솔분별시36%,6%；완대재료성본절약솔분별시5%,45%；정신병환자대신빈식별방식적만의솔분별시86%,99%；차이균유통계학의의(χ2치분별위45.81,282.74,490.08,10.07；P<0.01)。결론불동표식환자신빈식별정학솔불동。완대유리우제고정신병환자신빈식별적정학솔,이지문식별의정학솔최고,타피면완대재정신과사용적국한성,제고정신과호환쌍방신빈식별적의종성,강저신빈식별적결함솔,절약인력급재료성본급제고호환쌍방적만의솔。
Objective To explore the effects of different identity identification methods in the quality of clinical nursing management of psychosis patients. Methods By the conventional recognition, wristband identification, fingerprint identification, we compared the different identification correct rate, compliance rate, defect rate, wristband material cost saving rates, satisfaction of identification for mental patients before and after the identification. Results The rate of correct identification for patients with different identification were respectively 95. 60%, 99%, 100% with statistical significance (χ2 =62. 58,P<0. 05). After several correct rate of identification comparison, there were statistically significant differences in any two of three groups (χ2 =25. 42,44. 99, 10. 06;P<0. 01). Before and after the use of fingerprint identification instrument, the mental patients to identity compliance rates were 82% and 98% (χ2 =45. 81,P<0. 05); defect identification rates were 36% and 6% (χ2 =282. 74,P<0. 05);wrist strap material cost saving rates were 5% and 45% (χ2 =490. 08,P<0. 05);satisfaction with the way of identifying rates were 86% and 99% (χ2 =10. 07,P<0. 05). Conclusions Patients with different identification have different identity recognition correct rate. Wristband helps us improve the accuracy of identification, while the fingerprint identification device have the highest correct rate to indentify mental patients to without limitation use in Psychiatry Department by improving the psychiatric nursing compliance of both patient and medical staffs identification, reducing the defect identification rate, saving manpower and material costs and improving both nurses and patients satisfaction rate.