CAJ | 학술논문

作为当代修辞学观念基础的“不合作原则”以交流初始听话人是否与说话人合作作为区分标准，确定语用与修辞的分野。“不合作原则”合理解释了为什么“合作修辞”是一种矛盾提法；以“不合作原则”作为语用与修辞的分水岭有利于学术分工与合作，提高学术产能。从“不合作原则”看语用与修辞的关系，尤其是观照关联理论，将其与关联理论中“关联的交际原则”及“关联的认知原则”这两大基础原则加以对照，有助于促进学科相互发明，加深对两门学科的共性与个性的认识，丰富对语言运用的认识。
작위당대수사학관념기출적“불합작원칙”이교류초시은화인시부여설화인합작작위구분표준，학정어용여수사적분야。“불합작원칙”합리해석료위십요“합작수사”시일충모순제법；이“불합작원칙”작위어용여수사적분수령유리우학술분공여합작，제고학술산능。종“불합작원칙”간어용여수사적관계，우기시관조관련이론，장기여관련이론중“관련적교제원칙”급“관련적인지원칙”저량대기출원칙가이대조，유조우촉진학과상호발명，가심대량문학과적공성여개성적인식，봉부대어언운용적인식。
Liu & Zhu ( 2011 ) offers new insights into the unsettling relationship between rhetoric and pragmatics by proposing that each treat the other as its disciplinary antistrophos. It identifies and defines a“Non?Cooperative Principle”( NCP ) as the conceptual foundation for rhetoric and makes the cooperation/non?cooperation distinction that simultaneously divides the two disciplines and joins them together conceptu?ally. This paper takes a close look at this new theoretical perspective,elaborating its central argument that is unlike pragmatics,rhetoric presupposes an initial attitude of non?cooperation on the addressee’s part and is premised on a relational tension between S and H. From this argument it is inferable that one can never claim to perform rhetorically without making efforts to overcome a resistance from the audience,whereas in pragmat?ic performance. H is expected to work with S and is not supposed to put up a comparable resistance for S to deal with.