北京社会科学
北京社會科學
북경사회과학
Social Science of Beijing
2015年
10期
111-118
,共8页
快乐论%至善%明智%节制%伊壁鸠鲁主义
快樂論%至善%明智%節製%伊壁鳩魯主義
쾌악론%지선%명지%절제%이벽구로주의
Hedonism%the Good%prudence%moderation%Epicureanism
对于快乐论者来说，快乐是至善；但是他们对于什么是作为目的的善有不同看法。在快乐和明智的关系上，居勒尼学派认为对于快乐的选择并非总是通过明智的判断，而伊壁鸠鲁则认为快乐与明智两者不可分离。在快乐和节制的关系上，居勒尼学派否认作为目的的快乐必须受到节制，而伊壁鸠鲁认为作为目的的快乐必须受到节制。尽管居勒尼学派有可能陷入一种享乐的生活，但是伊壁鸠鲁主义不能被看成是一种享乐主义。
對于快樂論者來說，快樂是至善；但是他們對于什麽是作為目的的善有不同看法。在快樂和明智的關繫上，居勒尼學派認為對于快樂的選擇併非總是通過明智的判斷，而伊壁鳩魯則認為快樂與明智兩者不可分離。在快樂和節製的關繫上，居勒尼學派否認作為目的的快樂必鬚受到節製，而伊壁鳩魯認為作為目的的快樂必鬚受到節製。儘管居勒尼學派有可能陷入一種享樂的生活，但是伊壁鳩魯主義不能被看成是一種享樂主義。
대우쾌악론자래설，쾌악시지선；단시타문대우십요시작위목적적선유불동간법。재쾌악화명지적관계상，거륵니학파인위대우쾌악적선택병비총시통과명지적판단，이이벽구로칙인위쾌악여명지량자불가분리。재쾌악화절제적관계상，거륵니학파부인작위목적적쾌악필수수도절제，이이벽구로인위작위목적적쾌악필수수도절제。진관거륵니학파유가능함입일충향악적생활，단시이벽구로주의불능피간성시일충향악주의。
For the Hedonists , pleasure is the highest Good , but they disagreed on what kind of pleasure could be regarded as the highest aim .For the relation between pleasure and prudence , the Cyrenaic school thought that the choice of pleasure were not always made by prudent judgments , while Epicurus claimed that pleasure and prudence were inseparable .For the relation between pleasure and moderation , Epicurus held that the pleasure as the highest aim must be moderate , while the Cyrenaic school denied that proposition .Although it is possible for the Cyrenaic school to indulge in a dissolute life , Epicureanism could not be viewed as a hedonist as such .
