城市交通
城市交通
성시교통
Urban Transport of China
2015年
4期
44-55,7
,共13页
交通规划%道路分级%道路功能%交叉口
交通規劃%道路分級%道路功能%交扠口
교통규화%도로분급%도로공능%교차구
transportation planning%roadway classification%roadway functionalities%intersections
面对机动化和城镇化的快速发展,中国正处于必须认真梳理城市道路分级与交通组织方式、并做出转变的关键时期。通过对比分析中国、美国、日本的道路等级划分理论及案例,指出国内外道路分级存在较大差异且中国相关规范较为粗泛。通过对居住密度、出行方式、出行距离、土地利用、车流特征、道路线型等道路分级影响因素进行探讨,建议中国城市道路划分为4个功能等级和7个设计等级,并给出相应的设置条件建议。强调合理的道路分级既应保障城市跨区域交通高效的通过性,也应为小尺度交通活动和城市土地利用提供便利、安全的可达性;应将道路资源有效配置给公共交通、行人、自行车以及机动车,从而优化交通结构、提高交通运行效率。
麵對機動化和城鎮化的快速髮展,中國正處于必鬚認真梳理城市道路分級與交通組織方式、併做齣轉變的關鍵時期。通過對比分析中國、美國、日本的道路等級劃分理論及案例,指齣國內外道路分級存在較大差異且中國相關規範較為粗汎。通過對居住密度、齣行方式、齣行距離、土地利用、車流特徵、道路線型等道路分級影響因素進行探討,建議中國城市道路劃分為4箇功能等級和7箇設計等級,併給齣相應的設置條件建議。彊調閤理的道路分級既應保障城市跨區域交通高效的通過性,也應為小呎度交通活動和城市土地利用提供便利、安全的可達性;應將道路資源有效配置給公共交通、行人、自行車以及機動車,從而優化交通結構、提高交通運行效率。
면대궤동화화성진화적쾌속발전,중국정처우필수인진소리성시도로분급여교통조직방식、병주출전변적관건시기。통과대비분석중국、미국、일본적도로등급화분이론급안례,지출국내외도로분급존재교대차이차중국상관규범교위조범。통과대거주밀도、출행방식、출행거리、토지이용、차류특정、도로선형등도로분급영향인소진행탐토,건의중국성시도로화분위4개공능등급화7개설계등급,병급출상응적설치조건건의。강조합리적도로분급기응보장성시과구역교통고효적통과성,야응위소척도교통활동화성시토지이용제공편리、안전적가체성;응장도로자원유효배치급공공교통、행인、자행차이급궤동차,종이우화교통결구、제고교통운행효솔。
Facing rapid motorization and urbanization, it is critical for China to examine urban roadway classification and traffic organization, and make changes accordingly. By comparing related theories and practice of roadway classification in China, U.S. and Japan, this paper points out that roadway network classification in China is quite different from those in other countries and related specifications in China are relatively rough. Based on an analysis of influential factors on roadway classification including residen-tial density, travel mode, travel distance, land use, traffic flow characteristics and roadway design, the pa-per proposes an urban roadway hierarchy including 4 functional levels and 7 design levels in China, along with corresponding setting suggestions. The paper further emphasizes that a reasonable roadway classifica-tion should not only guarantee effective passing of urban cross-regional traffic, but also ensure convenient and safe accessibility for small-scale transportation activities and urban land use. The paper also stresses that road resources should be effectively allocated to pedestrian, bicycle, automobile and public transit so as to optimize travel mode share and traffic flow efficiency.