温州医科大学学报
溫州醫科大學學報
온주의과대학학보
Journal of Wenzhou Medical University
2015年
9期
679-683
,共5页
邵株燕%闻强%李丹%张平
邵株燕%聞彊%李丹%張平
소주연%문강%리단%장평
卵巢肿瘤%复发%生活质量%社会支持
卵巢腫瘤%複髮%生活質量%社會支持
란소종류%복발%생활질량%사회지지
ovarian tumor%recurrence%quality of life%social support
目的:调查分析复发卵巢癌患者的生活质量与社会支持状况,并分析两者间的相关性。方法:采用生活质量核心量表(QLQ-C30)和领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)对122例复发卵巢癌患者进行调查分析。结果:复发卵巢癌患者生活质量下降,总健康状况评分(56.48±22.02)不高,正向评分的功能领域中社会功能(64.48±25.70)得分最低,反向评分的经济领域(49.45±34.61)是降低生活质量的重要原因。但复发卵巢癌患者的社会支持较好,总体支持因子分为5.64±0.94,其中家庭内支持因子分(6.14±0.84)要高于家庭外支持因子分(5.39±1.16),差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。社会支持与经济领域呈负相关性,家庭内支持与认知功能、社会功能呈正相关性,与疲乏、疼痛呈负相关性(P <0.05)。结论:复发卵巢癌患者生活质量较差,社会支持与生活质量密切相关,医务工作者要重视并利用患者的社会支持系统,来提高患者的生活质量。
目的:調查分析複髮卵巢癌患者的生活質量與社會支持狀況,併分析兩者間的相關性。方法:採用生活質量覈心量錶(QLQ-C30)和領悟社會支持量錶(PSSS)對122例複髮卵巢癌患者進行調查分析。結果:複髮卵巢癌患者生活質量下降,總健康狀況評分(56.48±22.02)不高,正嚮評分的功能領域中社會功能(64.48±25.70)得分最低,反嚮評分的經濟領域(49.45±34.61)是降低生活質量的重要原因。但複髮卵巢癌患者的社會支持較好,總體支持因子分為5.64±0.94,其中傢庭內支持因子分(6.14±0.84)要高于傢庭外支持因子分(5.39±1.16),差異有統計學意義(P <0.01)。社會支持與經濟領域呈負相關性,傢庭內支持與認知功能、社會功能呈正相關性,與疲乏、疼痛呈負相關性(P <0.05)。結論:複髮卵巢癌患者生活質量較差,社會支持與生活質量密切相關,醫務工作者要重視併利用患者的社會支持繫統,來提高患者的生活質量。
목적:조사분석복발란소암환자적생활질량여사회지지상황,병분석량자간적상관성。방법:채용생활질량핵심량표(QLQ-C30)화령오사회지지량표(PSSS)대122례복발란소암환자진행조사분석。결과:복발란소암환자생활질량하강,총건강상황평분(56.48±22.02)불고,정향평분적공능영역중사회공능(64.48±25.70)득분최저,반향평분적경제영역(49.45±34.61)시강저생활질량적중요원인。단복발란소암환자적사회지지교호,총체지지인자분위5.64±0.94,기중가정내지지인자분(6.14±0.84)요고우가정외지지인자분(5.39±1.16),차이유통계학의의(P <0.01)。사회지지여경제영역정부상관성,가정내지지여인지공능、사회공능정정상관성,여피핍、동통정부상관성(P <0.05)。결론:복발란소암환자생활질량교차,사회지지여생활질량밀절상관,의무공작자요중시병이용환자적사회지지계통,래제고환자적생활질량。
Objective: To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) and the social support in patients with recur-rent ovarian cancer, and to analyze the relationship between them.Methods: 122 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were interviewed with two questionnaires: Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS).Results: QOL declined in recurrent ovarian cancer, with poor global health score (56.48±22.02). Among positive ratings in ifve functional domains, social functioning score (64.48±25.70) was the lowest. And among reverse ratings, ifnancial dififculties (49.45±34.61) were the most main factors reduc-ing QOL. The social support in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer was good. The mean score of total social support was 5.64±0.94, but the mean score of family support inside (6.14±0.84) was higher than that of family support outside (5.39±1.16). The difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.01). It showed a negative correla-tion between social support and ifnancial dififculties. Family support inside had positive correlation with score of cognitive functioning and social functioning, and negative correlation with score of fatigue and pain (P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer have poor QOL. The social support of them closely related with QOL, and we should use the social support sufifciently to improve QOL of patients.