中国医疗器械信息
中國醫療器械信息
중국의료기계신식
China Medical Device Information
2015年
10期
40-42,57
,共4页
刘嫣红%龚婉玲%柯军%苗晓琳
劉嫣紅%龔婉玲%柯軍%苗曉琳
류언홍%공완령%가군%묘효림
酸性氧化电位水%2％戊二醛%消毒效果%悬液定量杀菌试验%内镜清洗消毒模拟现场试验
痠性氧化電位水%2％戊二醛%消毒效果%懸液定量殺菌試驗%內鏡清洗消毒模擬現場試驗
산성양화전위수%2％무이철%소독효과%현액정량살균시험%내경청세소독모의현장시험
acidic electrolyzed-oxidizing water%2％ glutaraldehyde%disinfection effect%suspension quantitative germicidal test%simulated ifeld test
目的：比较酸性氧化电位水与2%戊二醛消毒液的消毒效果，为选择消毒液提供参考。方法：采用悬液定量杀菌试验和内镜清洗消毒模拟现场试验的方法，比较酸性氧化电位水与2%戊二醛消毒液的消毒效果。结果：杀菌试验中，酸性氧化电位水作用1m i n后对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌的杀灭对数值均达到5.0以上，对白色念珠菌的杀灭对数值达到4.0以上，与作用30m i n的2%戊二醛杀菌效果基本持平。内镜清洗消毒模拟现场试验中，两种消毒液的消除对数值均大于3，但相比消毒10m i n的2%戊二醛，使用酸性氧化电位水消毒5m i n的效果更佳。结论：与戊二醛消毒液相比，酸性氧化电位水具有作用快速、易冲洗、对人体无损害等优势，但使用过程中应注意保存方式和定期监测。
目的：比較痠性氧化電位水與2%戊二醛消毒液的消毒效果，為選擇消毒液提供參攷。方法：採用懸液定量殺菌試驗和內鏡清洗消毒模擬現場試驗的方法，比較痠性氧化電位水與2%戊二醛消毒液的消毒效果。結果：殺菌試驗中，痠性氧化電位水作用1m i n後對金黃色葡萄毬菌、大腸桿菌的殺滅對數值均達到5.0以上，對白色唸珠菌的殺滅對數值達到4.0以上，與作用30m i n的2%戊二醛殺菌效果基本持平。內鏡清洗消毒模擬現場試驗中，兩種消毒液的消除對數值均大于3，但相比消毒10m i n的2%戊二醛，使用痠性氧化電位水消毒5m i n的效果更佳。結論：與戊二醛消毒液相比，痠性氧化電位水具有作用快速、易遲洗、對人體無損害等優勢，但使用過程中應註意保存方式和定期鑑測。
목적：비교산성양화전위수여2%무이철소독액적소독효과，위선택소독액제공삼고。방법：채용현액정량살균시험화내경청세소독모의현장시험적방법，비교산성양화전위수여2%무이철소독액적소독효과。결과：살균시험중，산성양화전위수작용1m i n후대금황색포도구균、대장간균적살멸대수치균체도5.0이상，대백색념주균적살멸대수치체도4.0이상，여작용30m i n적2%무이철살균효과기본지평。내경청세소독모의현장시험중，량충소독액적소제대수치균대우3，단상비소독10m i n적2%무이철，사용산성양화전위수소독5m i n적효과경가。결론：여무이철소독액상비，산성양화전위수구유작용쾌속、역충세、대인체무손해등우세，단사용과정중응주의보존방식화정기감측。
Objective: To compare the disinfection effect of acidic electrolyzed-oxidizing water(AEOW) and 2% glutaraldehyde disinfectant,and provide reference for selecting disinfectant. Methods Suspension quantitative germicidal test and simulated ifeld test were used to compare disinfection effect of AEOW and 2% glutaraldehyde.Results: In the suspension quantitative germicidal test, the kiling logarithm values of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in exposed AEOW for 1 min were >5.0 and that of Candida albicans exposed for 1 min was >4.0. Meanwhile, 2% glutaraldehyde for 30 min had nearly the same result.In the simulated ifeld test, the kiling logarithm values of two disinfectants were >3. Comparing with 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min, AEOW was beter for disinfecting in 5 min.Conclusion Comparing with glutaraldehyde disinfectant, AEOW is considered to be beter at fast-acting, easily-cleaning and low-harming.Meanwhile, it should be kept away from the light with constantly testing.
