现代临床医学
現代臨床醫學
현대림상의학
Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
2015年
5期
374-376,378
,共4页
肺癌%健康教育%生活质量%认知度
肺癌%健康教育%生活質量%認知度
폐암%건강교육%생활질량%인지도
lung cancer%health education%quality of life%cognition
目的:观察健康教育对肺癌患者生活质量的影响。方法:以医院收治的90例肺癌患者作为研究对象,采用随机对照表将患者分为对照组和观察组。对照组45例行常规健康教育,观察组45例行多阶段健康教育。以欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生命质量测定量表(E-ORTC QLQ-C30)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SAS)评分,评估健康教育效果。结果:观察组整体功能、情绪功能、躯体功能、角色功能、认知功能评分分别为90.26±2.08分、94.33±3.24分、91.66±2.25分、95.48±3.36分、93.31±2.77分,均显著高于对照组( P<0.05)。干预后观察组SAS评分和SDS评分分别为29.65±1.29分和27.83±3.31分,显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组疾病相关知识的认知度、遵医行为、了解药物知识、良好生活习惯的百分比分别为86.67%、93.33%、84.44%、91.11%,均显著高于对照组( P<0.05)。结论:对肺癌患者实施多阶段健康教育,可满足其对健康知识的需求,提高生活质量。
目的:觀察健康教育對肺癌患者生活質量的影響。方法:以醫院收治的90例肺癌患者作為研究對象,採用隨機對照錶將患者分為對照組和觀察組。對照組45例行常規健康教育,觀察組45例行多階段健康教育。以歐洲癌癥研究與治療組織生命質量測定量錶(E-ORTC QLQ-C30)、焦慮自評量錶(SAS)、抑鬱自評量錶(SAS)評分,評估健康教育效果。結果:觀察組整體功能、情緒功能、軀體功能、角色功能、認知功能評分分彆為90.26±2.08分、94.33±3.24分、91.66±2.25分、95.48±3.36分、93.31±2.77分,均顯著高于對照組( P<0.05)。榦預後觀察組SAS評分和SDS評分分彆為29.65±1.29分和27.83±3.31分,顯著低于對照組(P<0.05)。觀察組疾病相關知識的認知度、遵醫行為、瞭解藥物知識、良好生活習慣的百分比分彆為86.67%、93.33%、84.44%、91.11%,均顯著高于對照組( P<0.05)。結論:對肺癌患者實施多階段健康教育,可滿足其對健康知識的需求,提高生活質量。
목적:관찰건강교육대폐암환자생활질량적영향。방법:이의원수치적90례폐암환자작위연구대상,채용수궤대조표장환자분위대조조화관찰조。대조조45례행상규건강교육,관찰조45례행다계단건강교육。이구주암증연구여치료조직생명질량측정량표(E-ORTC QLQ-C30)、초필자평량표(SAS)、억욱자평량표(SAS)평분,평고건강교육효과。결과:관찰조정체공능、정서공능、구체공능、각색공능、인지공능평분분별위90.26±2.08분、94.33±3.24분、91.66±2.25분、95.48±3.36분、93.31±2.77분,균현저고우대조조( P<0.05)。간예후관찰조SAS평분화SDS평분분별위29.65±1.29분화27.83±3.31분,현저저우대조조(P<0.05)。관찰조질병상관지식적인지도、준의행위、료해약물지식、량호생활습관적백분비분별위86.67%、93.33%、84.44%、91.11%,균현저고우대조조( P<0.05)。결론:대폐암환자실시다계단건강교육,가만족기대건강지식적수구,제고생활질량。
Objective:To observe the impact of health education on life quality of patient with lung cancer.Methods:90 cases of lung cancer patients were admitted to the hospital as research object, and were divided into control group ( 45 cases ) and observation group (45 cases) by random table;control group received routine health education,observation group received multi stages of health education;in both groups, the quality of life of the European Organization research and treatment of cancer ( measurement scale E-ORTC QLQ-C30 ) , self rating Anxiety Scale ( SAS ) , self rating Depression Scale ( SAS ) score, were evaluated after health education.Results:In observation group, the overall function, emotional function, physical function, role function,cognitive function score were 90.26 ±2.08, 94.33 ±3.24, 91.66 ±2.25, 95.48 ±3.36, 93.31 ±2.77 which were significantly higher than those in the control group;the difference had statistical significance(P<0.05).In observation group after the intervention the SAS score and SDS score were 29.65 ±1.29 and 27.83 ±3.31 which were significantly lower than those in the control group, the difference was significant(P<0.05).Cognition and behavior of medical compliance, disease related knowledge percentage, drug knowledge, good living habits in observation group were respectively 86.67%, 93.33%, 84.44%, 91.11%which were higher than those in the control group, the difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Implementation of multi stages of health education in lung cancer patients can meet the demand of health knowledge, improve the quality of life.