电网技术
電網技術
전망기술
Power System Technology
2015年
4期
1001-1007
,共7页
李丹%刘俊勇%刘友波%戴松灵%江润洲
李丹%劉俊勇%劉友波%戴鬆靈%江潤洲
리단%류준용%류우파%대송령%강윤주
电力市场%博弈%风电%储能%多代理
電力市場%博弈%風電%儲能%多代理
전력시장%박혁%풍전%저능%다대리
electricity market%game%wind power%energy storage%multi-agent
研究了考虑风电与储能参与的电力市场联动博弈问题。首先,在含有传统发电、供电、风电、储能商及用户的多方电力市场联动博弈模型中,针对风电与储能服务商的特点,设计了独立和联营2种运营模式,并分别建立了考虑投标风险的最佳风电投标量及储能充放电决策模型;然后,建立了基于多代理的电力市场联动博弈模型,对比和分析了2种模式下风电投标及储能充放电行为的差异,以及联营模式下考虑网络约束前后各方利润和线路负载等技术经济指标。仿真结果表明:风电商能够优化决策自身投标电量,获得合理的利润;风-储联营模式能够对风能进行合理转移,增加两者总利润;网络约束对市场中参与方的利润有重要影响。
研究瞭攷慮風電與儲能參與的電力市場聯動博弈問題。首先,在含有傳統髮電、供電、風電、儲能商及用戶的多方電力市場聯動博弈模型中,針對風電與儲能服務商的特點,設計瞭獨立和聯營2種運營模式,併分彆建立瞭攷慮投標風險的最佳風電投標量及儲能充放電決策模型;然後,建立瞭基于多代理的電力市場聯動博弈模型,對比和分析瞭2種模式下風電投標及儲能充放電行為的差異,以及聯營模式下攷慮網絡約束前後各方利潤和線路負載等技術經濟指標。倣真結果錶明:風電商能夠優化決策自身投標電量,穫得閤理的利潤;風-儲聯營模式能夠對風能進行閤理轉移,增加兩者總利潤;網絡約束對市場中參與方的利潤有重要影響。
연구료고필풍전여저능삼여적전력시장련동박혁문제。수선,재함유전통발전、공전、풍전、저능상급용호적다방전력시장련동박혁모형중,침대풍전여저능복무상적특점,설계료독립화련영2충운영모식,병분별건립료고필투표풍험적최가풍전투표량급저능충방전결책모형;연후,건립료기우다대리적전력시장련동박혁모형,대비화분석료2충모식하풍전투표급저능충방전행위적차이,이급련영모식하고필망락약속전후각방리윤화선로부재등기술경제지표。방진결과표명:풍전상능구우화결책자신투표전량,획득합리적리윤;풍-저련영모식능구대풍능진행합리전이,증가량자총리윤;망락약속대시장중삼여방적리윤유중요영향。
The electricity market linkage game, in which the wind power provider and energy storage provider participate, is researched. Firstly, in multipartite electricity market linkage game model including traditional gencos, power supply enterprises, wind power provider and energy storage provider, according to the characteristics of wind power provider and energy storage provider, two operating modes, namely independent operation and joint operation, are designed, and the optimal wind power bidding decision model and optimal charging/discharging decision model, in which the risk of bidding is taken into account, are established respectively; secondly, a multi-agent based electricity market linkage game model is built, and the differences between wind power bidding and charging/discharging behavior of energy storage provider as well as the benefits of different aspects and techno- economical indices such as line load and so on before and after considering network constraints under the joint operation mode are compared and analyzed. Simulation results show that the wind power provider can optimize and decide its own electricity quantity participating the bidding to achieve reasonable revenue; the joint operation mode of wind power provider with energy storage provider can transfer the wind energy reasonably to increase the benefits of both sides; there is important impact of network constraints on the benefits of the participants.