中国现代医药杂志
中國現代醫藥雜誌
중국현대의약잡지
Modern Medicine Journal of China
2015年
9期
32-34
,共3页
刘奕%陈震%冯春光%娄明%邵博一
劉奕%陳震%馮春光%婁明%邵博一
류혁%진진%풍춘광%루명%소박일
急性冠脉综合征%2型糖尿病%氯吡格雷抵抗
急性冠脈綜閤徵%2型糖尿病%氯吡格雷牴抗
급성관맥종합정%2형당뇨병%록필격뢰저항
Acute coronary syndrome%Type 2 diabetes mellitus%Clopidogrel resistance
目的:探讨合并2型糖尿病(DM)的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)后发生氯吡格雷抵抗的情况,分析相关危险因素。方法84例因ACS入院行PCI的患者,分为糖尿病组42例,非糖尿病组42例,根据血栓弹力图(TEG)监测血小板抑制率情况,比较两组临床资料,分析糖尿病患者氯吡格雷抵抗的相关危险因素。结果糖尿病组发生氯吡格雷抵抗11例(26.19%),非糖尿病组发生1例(2.38%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);糖尿病组空腹血糖水平、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平、甘油三酯、超敏C反应蛋白水平(hs-CRP)均明显高于非糖尿病组(P<0.05);分析显示空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、超敏C反应蛋白是影响患者发生氯吡格雷抵抗的危险因素。结论合并2型糖尿病的ACS患者氯吡格雷抵抗发生率高,且与患者的空腹血糖水平、糖化血红蛋白水平、超敏C反应蛋白水平密切相关。
目的:探討閤併2型糖尿病(DM)的急性冠脈綜閤徵(ACS)患者經皮冠狀動脈介入術(PCI)後髮生氯吡格雷牴抗的情況,分析相關危險因素。方法84例因ACS入院行PCI的患者,分為糖尿病組42例,非糖尿病組42例,根據血栓彈力圖(TEG)鑑測血小闆抑製率情況,比較兩組臨床資料,分析糖尿病患者氯吡格雷牴抗的相關危險因素。結果糖尿病組髮生氯吡格雷牴抗11例(26.19%),非糖尿病組髮生1例(2.38%),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);糖尿病組空腹血糖水平、糖化血紅蛋白(HbA1c)水平、甘油三酯、超敏C反應蛋白水平(hs-CRP)均明顯高于非糖尿病組(P<0.05);分析顯示空腹血糖、糖化血紅蛋白、超敏C反應蛋白是影響患者髮生氯吡格雷牴抗的危險因素。結論閤併2型糖尿病的ACS患者氯吡格雷牴抗髮生率高,且與患者的空腹血糖水平、糖化血紅蛋白水平、超敏C反應蛋白水平密切相關。
목적:탐토합병2형당뇨병(DM)적급성관맥종합정(ACS)환자경피관상동맥개입술(PCI)후발생록필격뢰저항적정황,분석상관위험인소。방법84례인ACS입원행PCI적환자,분위당뇨병조42례,비당뇨병조42례,근거혈전탄력도(TEG)감측혈소판억제솔정황,비교량조림상자료,분석당뇨병환자록필격뢰저항적상관위험인소。결과당뇨병조발생록필격뢰저항11례(26.19%),비당뇨병조발생1례(2.38%),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);당뇨병조공복혈당수평、당화혈홍단백(HbA1c)수평、감유삼지、초민C반응단백수평(hs-CRP)균명현고우비당뇨병조(P<0.05);분석현시공복혈당、당화혈홍단백、초민C반응단백시영향환자발생록필격뢰저항적위험인소。결론합병2형당뇨병적ACS환자록필격뢰저항발생솔고,차여환자적공복혈당수평、당화혈홍단백수평、초민C반응단백수평밀절상관。
Objective To discuss the clopidogrel resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods The patients with ACS (n=84) re-ceived PCI were randomly divided into diabetic group and non-diabetic group (42 cases in each group). The platelet aggrega-tion rate was compared by using Thrombelastography(TEG) between 2 groups after treatment with clopidogrel. The basic clini-cal data,related routine examination results were also compared between 2 groups. Independent risk factors of clopidogrel resis-tance were explored by multiple factor analysis. Results 11 patients (26.19%) had clopidogrel resistance in diabetic group, and 1 patient (2.38%) had clopidogrel resistance in non-diabetic group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). While the fasting blood glucose,HbA1c lever,triglyceride and high sensitive C reactive protein in diabetic group were significant higher than those in non-diabetic group (P<0.05). The fasting blood glucose,HbA1c lever and high sensitive C reactive protein were risk factors of clopidogrel resistance in patients. Conclusion Type 2 diabetic patients with ACS undergoing PCI have a higher clopidogrel resistance rate than those non-diabetic patients, and that relevant factors are the fasting blood glucose,HbA1c lever and high sensitive C reactive protein.