中华胃肠外科杂志
中華胃腸外科雜誌
중화위장외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2015年
9期
881-884
,共4页
王超%高志冬%申占龙%梁斌%姜可伟%沈凯%谢启伟%王杉%叶颖江
王超%高誌鼕%申佔龍%樑斌%薑可偉%瀋凱%謝啟偉%王杉%葉穎江
왕초%고지동%신점룡%량빈%강가위%침개%사계위%왕삼%협영강
胃肠间质瘤,食管胃结合部%腹腔镜手术%开腹手术%疗效
胃腸間質瘤,食管胃結閤部%腹腔鏡手術%開腹手術%療效
위장간질류,식관위결합부%복강경수술%개복수술%료효
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor,esophagogastric junction%Laparoscopic surgery%Laparotomy%Efficacy
目的:比较腹腔镜手术与开腹手术行食管胃结合部胃肠间质瘤切除的临床疗效差异。方法回顾性分析北京大学人民医院胃肠外科2004年10月至2014年10月间接受手术治疗的42例食管胃结合部胃肠间质瘤患者的临床病理资料。其中开腹手术20例(开腹组),腹腔镜手术22例(腹腔镜组),比较两组患者的短期疗效和长期预后。结果两组患者临床资料一致性良好。在短期疗效方面,腹腔镜组术后排气时间、术后恢复活动时间、术后进食时间和术后住院时间均明显少于开腹组(P<0.05);手术相关并发症发生率腹腔镜组与开腹组差异无统计学意义(0比10%,P=0.221)。在远期疗效方面,腹腔镜组与开腹组5年无病生存率差异无统计学意义(100%比89%,P=0.384)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗食管胃结合部胃肠间质瘤的短期疗效优于开腹手术,长期预后与开腹手术相当。
目的:比較腹腔鏡手術與開腹手術行食管胃結閤部胃腸間質瘤切除的臨床療效差異。方法迴顧性分析北京大學人民醫院胃腸外科2004年10月至2014年10月間接受手術治療的42例食管胃結閤部胃腸間質瘤患者的臨床病理資料。其中開腹手術20例(開腹組),腹腔鏡手術22例(腹腔鏡組),比較兩組患者的短期療效和長期預後。結果兩組患者臨床資料一緻性良好。在短期療效方麵,腹腔鏡組術後排氣時間、術後恢複活動時間、術後進食時間和術後住院時間均明顯少于開腹組(P<0.05);手術相關併髮癥髮生率腹腔鏡組與開腹組差異無統計學意義(0比10%,P=0.221)。在遠期療效方麵,腹腔鏡組與開腹組5年無病生存率差異無統計學意義(100%比89%,P=0.384)。結論腹腔鏡手術治療食管胃結閤部胃腸間質瘤的短期療效優于開腹手術,長期預後與開腹手術相噹。
목적:비교복강경수술여개복수술행식관위결합부위장간질류절제적림상료효차이。방법회고성분석북경대학인민의원위장외과2004년10월지2014년10월간접수수술치료적42례식관위결합부위장간질류환자적림상병리자료。기중개복수술20례(개복조),복강경수술22례(복강경조),비교량조환자적단기료효화장기예후。결과량조환자림상자료일치성량호。재단기료효방면,복강경조술후배기시간、술후회복활동시간、술후진식시간화술후주원시간균명현소우개복조(P<0.05);수술상관병발증발생솔복강경조여개복조차이무통계학의의(0비10%,P=0.221)。재원기료효방면,복강경조여개복조5년무병생존솔차이무통계학의의(100%비89%,P=0.384)。결론복강경수술치료식관위결합부위장간질류적단기료효우우개복수술,장기예후여개복수술상당。
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes between laparoscopy and open resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the esophagogastric junction. Methods Clinicopathological data of 42 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of esophagogastric junction undergoing resection in our department between October 2004 and October 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic resection (LR group) and 20 patients underwent open resection (OR group). Short-term efficacy and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in common data of patients. The recovery time in the LR group was significantly shorter than that in the OR group , including bowel function recovery, ambulation, resumption of oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the LR group was lower than that in the OR group (0 vs. 10%, P=0.221). Meanwhile difference of 5-year disease-free-survival between the two groups (LR 100% vs. OR 89% , P =0.384) was not statistically significant. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumor at the esophagogastric junction is superior to open resection in short-term efficacy, and similar to open resection in long-term outcomes.