洁净煤技术
潔淨煤技術
길정매기술
Clean Coal Technology
2015年
5期
123-126
,共4页
IGCC电站%燃气轮机组电站%燃煤电站%大气污染物
IGCC電站%燃氣輪機組電站%燃煤電站%大氣汙染物
IGCC전참%연기륜궤조전참%연매전참%대기오염물
IGCC power plant%gas turbine power plant%coal-fired power plant%atmospheric pollutant
为了对比IGCC电站与燃气轮机组电站,对中电投廊坊2 × 400 MW级IGCC项目和中电投廊坊2×400 MW级燃气热电工程中的数据进行分析,并参考中美2×400 MW级IGCC发电系统及华能天津临港经济区2 ×400 MW级燃气热电联产工程等项目,分别从大气污染物排放执行标准,实际可能达到的排放指标,电站的投资、固定成本、可变成本、单位成本等技术经济的角度对IGCC电站和燃气轮机组电站进行了比较. 结果表明,两者环境排放指标相当,但IGCC电站主要单位成本约为燃气轮机组电站的62. 2%,采用IGCC电站替代燃煤电站要优于燃气轮机组电站替代燃煤电站.
為瞭對比IGCC電站與燃氣輪機組電站,對中電投廊坊2 × 400 MW級IGCC項目和中電投廊坊2×400 MW級燃氣熱電工程中的數據進行分析,併參攷中美2×400 MW級IGCC髮電繫統及華能天津臨港經濟區2 ×400 MW級燃氣熱電聯產工程等項目,分彆從大氣汙染物排放執行標準,實際可能達到的排放指標,電站的投資、固定成本、可變成本、單位成本等技術經濟的角度對IGCC電站和燃氣輪機組電站進行瞭比較. 結果錶明,兩者環境排放指標相噹,但IGCC電站主要單位成本約為燃氣輪機組電站的62. 2%,採用IGCC電站替代燃煤電站要優于燃氣輪機組電站替代燃煤電站.
위료대비IGCC전참여연기륜궤조전참,대중전투랑방2 × 400 MW급IGCC항목화중전투랑방2×400 MW급연기열전공정중적수거진행분석,병삼고중미2×400 MW급IGCC발전계통급화능천진림항경제구2 ×400 MW급연기열전련산공정등항목,분별종대기오염물배방집행표준,실제가능체도적배방지표,전참적투자、고정성본、가변성본、단위성본등기술경제적각도대IGCC전참화연기륜궤조전참진행료비교. 결과표명,량자배경배방지표상당,단IGCC전참주요단위성본약위연기륜궤조전참적62. 2%,채용IGCC전참체대연매전참요우우연기륜궤조전참체대연매전참.
In order to make an objective comparison between IGCC power plant and gas turbine power plant,the data from two finished pro-jects of China Power Investment Corporation Langfang,which were 2×400 MW IGCC power plant project and 2×400 MW gas thermal pow-er engineering were analyzed. The operating experience of China and United States 2 × 400 MW IGCC power system and China Huaneng Group Tianjin Lingang economic zone 2×400 MW gas cogeneration engineering projects had good reference value. From the technical eco-nomic angle on IGCC power plant and gas turbine power plant,the emissions of air pollutants standard,actual attainable emissions targets, investment,fixed cost,variable cost,per unit cost and so on were compared. The results showed that the two plants had roughly similar e-missions,while the cost of IGCC power plant was 37. 8% less than the cost of gas turbine power plant,so IGCC power plant was a more ad-vantage alternative.
