湖南大学学报(社会科学版)
湖南大學學報(社會科學版)
호남대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences)
2015年
5期
144-149
,共6页
侵权责任法 36 条的适用%表达自由%保护
侵權責任法 36 條的適用%錶達自由%保護
침권책임법 36 조적괄용%표체자유%보호
Enforcement of Article 36 of Torts%Freedom of Expression%Protection
《侵权责任法》第36条适用中会产生对表达自由侵害问题。当前网络侵权规则适用困境表现在具体案件中表达自由无确定保障和自由的行使无替代途径。形成原因包括宪法性权利和自由的侵害无有效的救济途径、36条规则设计忽视了表达自由的保护和法条实施效果容易造成对表达自由的侵害。走出困境的路径有五个方面。包括着力构建司法解释统一条件下的二元模式、在法律解释中体现对表达自由保护的三原则、注重特殊主体利益保护和区分不同场合保护表达自由等。问题的根本解决还要从宏观入手,理顺宪法性权利和自由与民法上权利的关系,加强行业自律以保护表达自由。
《侵權責任法》第36條適用中會產生對錶達自由侵害問題。噹前網絡侵權規則適用睏境錶現在具體案件中錶達自由無確定保障和自由的行使無替代途徑。形成原因包括憲法性權利和自由的侵害無有效的救濟途徑、36條規則設計忽視瞭錶達自由的保護和法條實施效果容易造成對錶達自由的侵害。走齣睏境的路徑有五箇方麵。包括著力構建司法解釋統一條件下的二元模式、在法律解釋中體現對錶達自由保護的三原則、註重特殊主體利益保護和區分不同場閤保護錶達自由等。問題的根本解決還要從宏觀入手,理順憲法性權利和自由與民法上權利的關繫,加彊行業自律以保護錶達自由。
《침권책임법》제36조괄용중회산생대표체자유침해문제。당전망락침권규칙괄용곤경표현재구체안건중표체자유무학정보장화자유적행사무체대도경。형성원인포괄헌법성권리화자유적침해무유효적구제도경、36조규칙설계홀시료표체자유적보호화법조실시효과용역조성대표체자유적침해。주출곤경적로경유오개방면。포괄착력구건사법해석통일조건하적이원모식、재법률해석중체현대표체자유보호적삼원칙、주중특수주체이익보호화구분불동장합보호표체자유등。문제적근본해결환요종굉관입수,리순헌법성권리화자유여민법상권리적관계,가강행업자률이보호표체자유。
The most special and important conflict of rights in the enforcement of article 36 of tort law of the People’s Republic of China is the conflict of freedom of expression and the right of personality.This is a conflict between basic freedom in Constitutional Law and private rights.Rules applied to the common media are not suitable to handle this conflict for differences of internet media.The protection of freedom of expression by Article 36 is recessive,it has no means of relief at the same time.When resolving conflicts, it is important to know that the fast diffusion contributes to both the spread of damage and the elimination of damage.Reasons can be found from institutional angle and duty angle which formed conflicts.It is an important method to balance the interests (freedom)of civil subjects.Freedom of expression and the right of personality should to be equally protected.When interpreting and implementing the rule,it has to ac-cord with principle of freedom of expression restriction.We can resolve this conflict in macroscopic view and microcosmic view.Ethics method and law method are necessary to handle this problem,self-regulation could also play an important role.