临床神经外科杂志
臨床神經外科雜誌
림상신경외과잡지
Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery
2015年
5期
324-327
,共4页
纵振坤%于如同%范月超%刘勇
縱振坤%于如同%範月超%劉勇
종진곤%우여동%범월초%류용
颅内动脉瘤%数字减影血管造影%CT血管造影%显微外科手术
顱內動脈瘤%數字減影血管造影%CT血管造影%顯微外科手術
로내동맥류%수자감영혈관조영%CT혈관조영%현미외과수술
intracranial aneurysm%digital subtraction angiography%CT angiography%microsurgery
目的:探讨CTA与DSA在颅内动脉瘤诊治过程中各自的优势,为改进临床工作提供依据。方法回顾性分析54例颅内动脉瘤患者的CTA、DSA和手术资料,进行结果对比分析。所有病例均于术前行CTA和DSA两种检查,54例患者中,14例栓塞治疗,40例行开颅手术。结果将CTA、DSA检查诊断结果与最终确诊结果比较,CTA检出颅内动脉瘤的敏感度为96.3%,准确度为98.6%;DSA检出颅内动脉瘤的敏感度为98.1%,准确度为98.6%,CTA的敏感度略高于DSA,但无统计学意义。 CTA、DSA在准确显示动脉瘤立体形态等方面占检出动脉瘤的百分比分别为77.9%与57.3%。结论 CTA与DSA在颅内动脉瘤检出率方面无显著差异,两种检查方法都因为各自既有某些长处可以互相补充检查信息,不应以一种方法作为绝对的“金标准”。 CTA对于颅内动脉瘤立体形态的显示情况优于DSA,为选定治疗方案提供了重要依据,但对于颈内动脉海绵窦段动脉瘤应着重参考DSA,DSA在动脉瘤诊治过程中仍起重要作用。
目的:探討CTA與DSA在顱內動脈瘤診治過程中各自的優勢,為改進臨床工作提供依據。方法迴顧性分析54例顱內動脈瘤患者的CTA、DSA和手術資料,進行結果對比分析。所有病例均于術前行CTA和DSA兩種檢查,54例患者中,14例栓塞治療,40例行開顱手術。結果將CTA、DSA檢查診斷結果與最終確診結果比較,CTA檢齣顱內動脈瘤的敏感度為96.3%,準確度為98.6%;DSA檢齣顱內動脈瘤的敏感度為98.1%,準確度為98.6%,CTA的敏感度略高于DSA,但無統計學意義。 CTA、DSA在準確顯示動脈瘤立體形態等方麵佔檢齣動脈瘤的百分比分彆為77.9%與57.3%。結論 CTA與DSA在顱內動脈瘤檢齣率方麵無顯著差異,兩種檢查方法都因為各自既有某些長處可以互相補充檢查信息,不應以一種方法作為絕對的“金標準”。 CTA對于顱內動脈瘤立體形態的顯示情況優于DSA,為選定治療方案提供瞭重要依據,但對于頸內動脈海綿竇段動脈瘤應著重參攷DSA,DSA在動脈瘤診治過程中仍起重要作用。
목적:탐토CTA여DSA재로내동맥류진치과정중각자적우세,위개진림상공작제공의거。방법회고성분석54례로내동맥류환자적CTA、DSA화수술자료,진행결과대비분석。소유병례균우술전행CTA화DSA량충검사,54례환자중,14례전새치료,40례행개로수술。결과장CTA、DSA검사진단결과여최종학진결과비교,CTA검출로내동맥류적민감도위96.3%,준학도위98.6%;DSA검출로내동맥류적민감도위98.1%,준학도위98.6%,CTA적민감도략고우DSA,단무통계학의의。 CTA、DSA재준학현시동맥류입체형태등방면점검출동맥류적백분비분별위77.9%여57.3%。결론 CTA여DSA재로내동맥류검출솔방면무현저차이,량충검사방법도인위각자기유모사장처가이호상보충검사신식,불응이일충방법작위절대적“금표준”。 CTA대우로내동맥류입체형태적현시정황우우DSA,위선정치료방안제공료중요의거,단대우경내동맥해면두단동맥류응착중삼고DSA,DSA재동맥류진치과정중잉기중요작용。
Objective To evaluate the value of CTA and DSA in the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysm and provide evidence to improve clinical work .Methods The clinical data of CTA, DSA and surgical data of 54 cases of intracranial aneurysms were analyzed retrospectively .The results were compared and analyzed .Of 54 patients performed with CTA and DSA ,14 were treated with embolization and 40 were treated with craniotomy .Results CTA and DSA examination results were compared with the final diagnosis .The sensitivity of CTA was 96.3%, and the accuracy was 98.6%. While the sensitivity and accuracy of DSA were 98.1%and 98.6%.The sensitivity of CTA was little higher than that of DSA , but no statistical significance .In the accurate display of the three-dimensional shape of the aneurysm by CTA and DSA , the percentage were 77.9% and 57.3%respectively .Conclusions There is no significant difference between CTA and DSA in the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms .The two methods are all because they have some good points , they can complement each other , and they should not be used as a “gold standard”.CTA is superior to DSA in the stereoscopic display of intracranial aneurysms , it provides an important basis for the selection of treatment scheme .But for the intracavernous internal carotid artery aneurysm should refer to DSA , DSA still plays an important role in the process of diagnosis and treatment of aneurysm .